18.08.2013 Views

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

With respect to this first possibility, most forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Alberta are pervasively available<br />

and require no significant travel. There are over 2,400 retail outlets to buy lottery tickets,<br />

<strong>in</strong>stant w<strong>in</strong> tickets, or bet on sports; over 1,000 bars that provide VLTs; and about 90<br />

community and commercial b<strong>in</strong>go halls. The only th<strong>in</strong>gs that might require some travel are<br />

racetracks (only 4 that are regularly operational) and cas<strong>in</strong>os. However, patronage levels for<br />

horse rac<strong>in</strong>g are too low for their travel-related expenses to be very important. Table 18 (p.<br />

103) has established that only 3% to 5% <strong>of</strong> Albertans bet on horse rac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the period 2007 –<br />

2009, with a significant portion <strong>of</strong> these <strong>in</strong>dividuals bett<strong>in</strong>g at the much more widely distributed<br />

teletheatres rather than at the racetrack. Also, with 27 cas<strong>in</strong>os distributed throughout the<br />

prov<strong>in</strong>ce, very few people have to travel very far. Nonetheless, a question was asked <strong>in</strong> the<br />

2008 and 2009 population surveys that specifically addressed this issue. For the 19.9% <strong>of</strong><br />

people who reported visit<strong>in</strong>g an Alberta cas<strong>in</strong>o <strong>in</strong> the past year, they were asked “On average,<br />

how much would you estimate you spend on hotels, food, dr<strong>in</strong>ks, shopp<strong>in</strong>g or other attractions<br />

each time you visit your favourite (Alberta) cas<strong>in</strong>o?” The modal response was “noth<strong>in</strong>g” (46%<br />

<strong>of</strong> respondents), the median was $5, and the average was $91. Thus, <strong>in</strong> summary, it seems<br />

unlikely that cas<strong>in</strong>o <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Alberta generates significant travel-related expenses that could<br />

potentially impact other travel-related <strong>in</strong>dustries.<br />

The possibility still exists that <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> has resulted <strong>in</strong> the redirection <strong>of</strong> money from other<br />

sector(s) <strong>of</strong> the economy, and that private <strong>in</strong>dustry impacts could be manifest <strong>in</strong> this manner.<br />

However, there does not appear to be much evidence for such impacts. Another question <strong>in</strong><br />

the 2008 population survey asked “Has <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> replaced other recreational activities for you<br />

<strong>in</strong> the past 5 years”. 91 Only 2.6% <strong>of</strong> the overall sample said “yes”, with this endorsement mostly<br />

com<strong>in</strong>g from the small percentage <strong>of</strong> Alberta gamblers who have been identified as<br />

contribut<strong>in</strong>g the lion’s share <strong>of</strong> Alberta <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue (Tables 22a,b, p. 111). Furthermore,<br />

the most commonly endorsed activities that <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> had replaced tended to be th<strong>in</strong>gs that did<br />

not cost money: participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sports (play<strong>in</strong>g, coach<strong>in</strong>g), outdoor leisure (e.g., walk<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

camp<strong>in</strong>g, driv<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>of</strong>f-road<strong>in</strong>g, horseback rid<strong>in</strong>g), <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g/spend<strong>in</strong>g time with friends, etc.<br />

A second way <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g the possibility <strong>of</strong> redirected money is by exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether<br />

annual changes <strong>in</strong> reported <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditures are related to annual changes <strong>in</strong> other<br />

reported household expenditures. On an annual basis from 1997 to 2008 the Statistics Canada<br />

Survey <strong>of</strong> Household Expenditures has asked a large representative sampl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Albertans to<br />

estimate their past year household expenditures <strong>in</strong> 14 different categories: food, shelter,<br />

household operation, household furnish<strong>in</strong>gs and equipment, cloth<strong>in</strong>g, transportation, health<br />

care, personal care, recreation, read<strong>in</strong>g materials, education, tobacco and alcohol,<br />

miscellaneous, and <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. A Pearson correlation was conducted between reported<br />

<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure <strong>in</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these 12 years aga<strong>in</strong>st expenditure <strong>in</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these 13 other<br />

categories. None <strong>of</strong> the 13 correlations with <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure was found to be statistically<br />

significant. All correlations but one were slightly positive, reflect<strong>in</strong>g the fact there has been<br />

91 Admittedly, a better question would have been whether the person is spend<strong>in</strong>g less on other th<strong>in</strong>gs because <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.<br />

201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!