18.08.2013 Views

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

gambling in alberta - Research Services - University of Lethbridge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

very small percentage <strong>of</strong> people <strong>in</strong> each group with very high expenditures. Hence the higher<br />

regressivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> revenue (that still occurs with median expenditure) is essentially<br />

<strong>in</strong>consequential for the large majority <strong>of</strong> people. This serves to rem<strong>in</strong>d us that problem<br />

<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> status is a much stronger predictor <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> expenditure (see Table 22b, p. 111)<br />

than is <strong>in</strong>come.<br />

Personal Income<br />

Category<br />

Table 38: Past Year Reported Expenditure on Gambl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Alberta by<br />

Personal Income Group <strong>in</strong> 2008/2009.<br />

Average Past<br />

Year<br />

Gambl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Expenditure<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Income<br />

Average Past<br />

Year<br />

Expenditure<br />

Represents<br />

Median Past<br />

Year<br />

Gambl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Expenditure<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Income<br />

Median Past<br />

Year<br />

Expenditure<br />

Represents<br />

154<br />

% <strong>of</strong> Total Past<br />

Year Reported<br />

Expenditures<br />

Less than $20,000 $1,982 9.9% $120 0.6% 26.4%<br />

$20,000 to $40,000 $1,109 3.7% $144 0.5% 21.1%<br />

$50,000 to $70,000 $1,254 2.1% $144 0.2% 21.3%<br />

$80,000 to $100,000 $981 1.1% $180 0.2% 9.9%<br />

$110,000 and Higher $2,280 1.8% $168 0.1% 21.3%<br />

Note: Income group was self-reported, with the person asked to <strong>in</strong>dicate to the nearest $10,000 how much<br />

personal <strong>in</strong>come they made <strong>in</strong> the past calendar year.<br />

Attitudes<br />

An argument can be made that the general public’s current support or non-support <strong>of</strong> <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

is as important as <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong>’s objective beneficial or detrimental effects. Attitudes toward<br />

<strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> have not been assessed as frequently as participation rates or problem <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

prevalence. In ‘modern times’, the first population survey that <strong>in</strong>quired about Albertan’s<br />

attitudes toward legal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> was done <strong>in</strong> 1992 (see Appendix B for details). In that year<br />

1,277 adult Albertans were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with the statement “There<br />

is too much legal <strong>gambl<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Alberta”. As can be seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 32, <strong>in</strong> 1992 more people<br />

disagreed with this statement than agreed. 70 However, this survey was carried out when there<br />

were only 7 cas<strong>in</strong>os <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g just table games, and before the <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> VLTs (<strong>in</strong> March <strong>of</strong><br />

that year), slot mach<strong>in</strong>es, and satellite b<strong>in</strong>go.<br />

70 Agree and disagree response options have been collapsed <strong>in</strong>to just Agree or Disagree categories. Orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

response options were: strongly disagree, moderately disagree, slightly disagree, slightly agree, moderately agree,<br />

strongly agree.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!