26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

❚❘<br />

USING PERSONALITY TYPOLOGY TO BUILD<br />

UNDERSTANDING<br />

Toni La Motta<br />

Understanding how others function is a first step in working with them. Organizations<br />

consist of people who differ from one another on almost every dimension possible.<br />

Diversity certainly is a challenge that is here to stay.<br />

However, diversity also offers an opportunity to appreciate differences. In the face<br />

of constant change, organizations need the differing strengths of different types of<br />

people. Increasingly organizations are turning to human resource development (HRD)<br />

professionals to guide them in managing change and managing diversity. The HRD<br />

professional then acts as a bridge between past and future technologies and as a<br />

facilitator between employees and managers and among various teams within an<br />

organization. As such, an HRD professional plays roles ranging from teacher to<br />

technician to prophet to psychologist.<br />

In a dynamic environment, the most important and least understood HRD role may<br />

be that of psychologist. People react in many ways to changes around them; some adjust<br />

well, but others see change as threatening and react defensively. An effective way to<br />

diminish the defensiveness that occurs with change is to define roles clearly and to make<br />

personnel feel acknowledged and appreciated. Understanding theories of personality<br />

type can help an HRD professional in these endeavors.<br />

This article begins with brief reviews of three related theories of personality<br />

typology: Jung, Myers and Briggs, and Keirsey and Bates. Jung’s work formed the basis<br />

of the later work of Myers and Briggs; the work of Myers and Briggs, in turn, formed<br />

the basis of Keirsey and Bates’ work. Next the article describes the four dimensions of<br />

personality that provide the structure for these three theories. These dimensions are<br />

extraverts/introverts, sensors/intuitors, thinkers/feelers, and judgers/perceivers. The<br />

article subsequently outlines Jung’s functional types and then provides detailed<br />

explanations of the more widely recognized Myers-Briggs types and Keirsey and Bates<br />

temperaments.<br />

The explanatory material is important to an understanding of the next section, the<br />

role of temperament and management style. Following that, four case studies of how<br />

personality typology can be used in an organizational setting are presented. Finally, the<br />

article describes action steps that can be taken by managers and HRD practitioners who<br />

want to use personality typology to enhance understanding in the workplace.<br />

Originally published in The 1992 Annual: Developing Human Resources by J. William Pfeiffer (Ed.), San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer &<br />

Company.<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright ©1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!