26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Self-Awareness<br />

One technique in this approach is to divide a group of trainees into pairs and to ask one<br />

member of each pair to act in a prescribed nonverbal manner that will elicit feelings of<br />

discomfort in the other person about his or her partner’s “strange” behavior.<br />

As a sample exercise on proxemic behavior (use of space), the trainees are divided<br />

into two groups. Separately, each group discusses issues such as “why we want to go<br />

overseas” or “anticipated difficulties overseas.” Then members of one group are told<br />

that when they rejoin the other group and are matched with their partners, they are to<br />

establish a comfortable distance and then decrease it by one inch each minute or by<br />

prearranged signals from the trainer. Signals could include the trainer’s moving from<br />

one spot in the room to another or stopping the group to find out what specifics they<br />

talked about and then asking them to continue. In this case, the trainer’s questions<br />

should be about the content of the conversation, not about the experiment in process.<br />

When the distance has been shortened by six inches or more, the nondirected partners<br />

will experience discomfort and, consciously or unconsciously, will start moving away.<br />

It is easy at this point to explain that the directed partners were imitating the<br />

“comfort distance” of South Americans and that if the undirected partners were to retreat<br />

in the same way with a Latin, the Latin would think them unfriendly and cold.<br />

Conversely, in Somalia, it would be the American who would be perceived as<br />

aggressive by standing too close for Somali comfort.<br />

Basically, this technique attempts to sensitize trainees to many other behavior<br />

patterns of nonverbal communication by taking an “informed” partner and a “control”<br />

partner and directing the former to alter his or her nonverbal behavior in a gradual<br />

manner to make the partner react. Both people will have an emotional or visceral<br />

reaction, which they can share at the conclusion of each exercise. Emphasis is placed on<br />

the reciprocal nature of the partners’ discomfort and confusion.<br />

These group sensitizing techniques are based on the principle that people will react<br />

emotionally and will give social meaning to alterations of standard American patterns of<br />

nonverbal behavior, for example, when someone blinks often, he or she is nervous; if the<br />

person avoids eye contact, he or she is insecure or untrustworthy; if the person does not<br />

nod his or her head in agreement or shake it in disagreement, he or she is not paying<br />

attention. And generally our interpretation is correct—if the other person is an<br />

American.<br />

Role Playing<br />

In addition to group experiences with a self-awareness emphasis, there are role-play<br />

techniques in which nonverbal patterns of the target language group are emphasized.<br />

Trainees watch and interpret. A dialogue with the host-national role player helps the<br />

trainees to discover what cues were misread and what the consequences of their<br />

misinterpretation could be.<br />

Potential areas of discomfort for both the American and the host national are further<br />

explored after a trainee and the host-national role player have engaged in a role-play<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright © 1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!