26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The “Too Much, Too Little” Syndrome<br />

Much has been written in recent years about the need to empower employees to<br />

customize service for customers. Yet most companies are still organized according to<br />

their functional responsibilities, and most perpetuate strong hierarchies. In a traditional<br />

organizational hierarchy, customer-contact employees do not know where to focus their<br />

actions. Although they are told that serving the customer is their most important task,<br />

they receive a different message—less explicit but perhaps more powerful—that<br />

responding to the boss’s concerns and adhering to policies and procedures are the best<br />

ways to earn promotions and to stay out of trouble. This confusion in priorities is not<br />

only frustrating to service professionals; it also results in inconsistent and inflexible<br />

service to customers.<br />

In an attempt to overcome this confusion, many companies have adopted an<br />

inverted-pyramid organizational structure that puts the customer-contact employees at<br />

the top of the organizational chart. These companies also redefine the role of<br />

management in such a way that the primary responsibility of managers is to be<br />

responsive to the needs of the service professionals. Rigid rules are replaced with<br />

flexible guidelines so that employees will be better able to serve the customer.<br />

Although changing the leader’s role from “controlling” to “responsive” is a<br />

prerequisite to successful service delivery, it is not enough. The authors have found that<br />

many service-improvement efforts fail despite the change in management’s role because<br />

leaders have not effectively set the stage for people to be responsible and accountable<br />

for their service efforts. An organization must ensure that the desired service outcomes<br />

are well defined, that the service-delivery process is clearly communicated and<br />

perceived to be flexible, that core values governing every employee’s actions are<br />

established, and that every employee understands his or her role. Otherwise, front-line<br />

employees are often unwilling or unable to take the risk necessary to embrace their<br />

changed roles and to deliver service in a way that consistently exceeds customer<br />

expectations. A culture that enables the delivery of successful service is one that<br />

balances direction and autonomy, flexibility and accountability, and the freedom to<br />

customize and a predictable delivery process.<br />

FUNDAMENTAL 6: DEFINE THE PLAYING FIELD<br />

People’s reactions to being introduced to a new game are predictable: “How do you<br />

score? Which actions are permitted and which are not?” No matter what game is being<br />

played, people demand to know how the winners and losers will be judged.<br />

Similarly, front-line employees must understand the rules of play and how to win<br />

before they can successfully customize service. There must be a clearly defined<br />

direction (a goal line that indicates how to score) and predefined parameters (the “rules”<br />

or boundaries) that outline the limits of responsibility and decision making. Employees<br />

must feel secure that within these boundaries they are free to use their intelligence,<br />

creativity, and direction to exceed the customer’s expectations.<br />

408 ❘❚<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright ©1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!