26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It is also helpful to visualize a sequence of action steps. In the example given<br />

above, “defining the issue” logically preceded the other steps as it is important to agree<br />

on the subject for argument before beginning to discuss it.<br />

To avoid confusion, separate each general objective and the action steps connected<br />

with it, just as you would a clause in a contract. If you are developing a method for<br />

dealing with conflict in one section of your contract, for example, you should not<br />

include guidelines for completing chores, unless the chores are directly related to your<br />

conflict.<br />

The best way to change is to act differently now. People have a tendency to<br />

postpone remedial actions, especially when they seem difficult or costly, but the past<br />

cannot be relived. Specify your action steps in the present tense and in the active voice,<br />

such as “summarizes,” “clarifies,” “asks,” “takes,” “names.”<br />

Have an objective outsider read your contract to make sure that your goals and<br />

terms are clear. Remember, however, that your purpose should not be to persuade this<br />

person to take sides with either partner on an issue.<br />

Finally, specify a time in the future to review your contract and renegotiate it if<br />

necessary. When reviewing your contract, you might ask some of the following<br />

questions:<br />

■ Are the behaviors called for by the contract appropriate to the issue?<br />

■ Do the action steps adequately represent the behavior associated with the general<br />

objective?<br />

■ Is the contract too rigid or too flexible?<br />

■ As they are stated, are the objectives attainable?<br />

■ Do the objectives agree with the philosophy of our relationship and with the aim<br />

of shared responsibility?<br />

Contracting explicit, negotiated interpersonal contracts can be a very useful device<br />

for change in intimate relationships. The success of the process requires an atmosphere<br />

of mutual trust, time, helpful assumptions about each other, clear objectives, and a<br />

sequence of specific action steps toward the goal of mutual change.<br />

REFERENCE<br />

Sherwood, J.J., & Glidewell, J.C. (1973). Planned renegotiation: A normsetting OD intervention. In J.E. Jones &<br />

J.W. Pfeiffer (Eds.), The 1973 annual handbook for group facilitators (pp. 195-202). San Diego, CA:<br />

Pfeiffer & Company.<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright ©1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 311

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!