26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

form they take, these sequences describe a related series of conditions through which an<br />

individual or a group passes during a particular period of time. One stage of a sequence<br />

does not necessarily result in the following one, although typical sequences that recur<br />

may repeat their stages. The causes underlying sequences may be found in ecological<br />

and social interactions among people, in biological processes that result in birth and<br />

mortality, and in various processes that change the physical environment (Quinn, 1950).<br />

In Figure 1, ecological interaction is shown as influencing social interaction and as<br />

being influenced by it. Ecological interaction has traditionally been viewed as<br />

Darwinian competition, but many types of ecological interaction involve cooperation.<br />

For example, in order to interact competitively (or even conflictively), opponents will<br />

reach a consensus on a minimum number of ground rules that will govern the situation.<br />

Therefore, ecological interaction is best characterized as involving opposition and<br />

cooperation rather than competition.<br />

Those who study ecology as a specialty have abstracted demography and human<br />

ecology from ecological interaction. Few OD facilitators concern themselves with these<br />

specialties, although, in working with groups, many have a keen awareness of the<br />

interconnection between ecological and social interaction, particularly in such<br />

interventions as “conflict management,” main office/subsidiary team building, and the<br />

like.<br />

THE OPPOSITION-COOPERATION CONTINUUM<br />

The continuum of opposition-cooperation deserves greater attention in organization<br />

development than it has been given. It is a useful focal point for the study of groups and<br />

action research involving groups and can offer a helpful perspective for the OD<br />

practitioner. It is also a continuum of social integration and isolation, as suggested by<br />

Figure 1.<br />

The opposition-cooperation continuum manifests itself in everyday life in<br />

interpersonal relations. For example, cooperation is apparent when two people walk<br />

down a wooded path side by side, physically separate as persons but headed in the same<br />

direction and mutually aware of each other. Opposition is apparent when the two break<br />

contact with each other and go their separate physical ways while simultaneously<br />

becoming socially and emotionally disengaged. They may harbor negative feelings of<br />

each other; or their feelings may, in time, soften and lead to a rapprochement,<br />

culminating in the reestablishment of face-to-face relations. On the other hand, in human<br />

affairs the breaking of physical contacts may not imply any corresponding negative<br />

feelings but merely signify that one or the other parties is required physically to separate<br />

himself or herself, because of status and role requirements, from other institutional<br />

domains to which the person belongs. Length of time is used to distinguish mere<br />

separation from opposition. Thus, the opposition-cooperation continuum is often the<br />

social reality with which we are concerned in organizational and group life.<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright ©1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 375

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!