26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. Use representative work activities and outcomes from service and product areas.<br />

Distinguish between services and products where possible. Try to view products<br />

and services from the “other” person’s perspective.<br />

6. Encourage people to take ownership in both the process of developing a<br />

definition and the definition itself. People who believe in the definitions they<br />

help create are likely to use them.<br />

7. If possible, determine where the organization is in its growth cycle. Mature,<br />

fully functioning organizations, for example, will have a strong culture; their<br />

visions, missions, goals, and strategic plans will be different from those of new,<br />

energetic, flexible, start-up companies.<br />

8. Look for cultural differences in operating procedures, viewpoints, and leadership<br />

style; in spin-off, newly merged organizations or organizations in which<br />

outsourcing is common, determining a clear-cut culture can be difficult.<br />

9. Use a systems feedback approach to generate definitions and keep them current.<br />

Follow the sequence of (1) input, (2) throughput, and (3) output. Feedback that<br />

cycles through the system may re-enter at any point. Feedback on the “fit” of the<br />

definition may be directed to customers, clients, partners, and numerous end<br />

users.<br />

10. Ensure that definitions incorporate the changing nature of work and the<br />

workplace. However, avoid improvement that is an end unto itself.<br />

USING OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS TO BENCHMARK<br />

Applying the process of developing operational definitions to benchmarking naturally<br />

begins with defining benchmarking. This key process in quality change and<br />

improvement initiatives reflects many personal and organizational factors, including the<br />

service sector, in product-based and materials-processing industries (Smith, 1995a).<br />

Benchmarking<br />

“Benchmarking,” a term first used in surveying, is a standard or point of reference from<br />

which measurements can be made. In organizations, benchmarking is a continuous,<br />

systematic process of measuring a company’s current business operations and<br />

comparing them to the operations of “best practices” companies.<br />

Benchmarking plays a prime role in total quality management and is a key factor in<br />

many processes that organizations use to evaluate “quality status.”<br />

Definitions of benchmarking and benchmarking processes are still evolving. Some<br />

examples of operational definitions of benchmarking follow (Pulat, 1994):<br />

■<br />

In 1979, Xerox redefined benchmarking as a continuous process used to measure<br />

products, services, and practices against those of companies recognized as world<br />

leaders or competitors.<br />

452 ❘❚<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright ©1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!