26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

To enhance her own effectiveness, the woman trainer needs to be especially aware<br />

of certain issues. In design sessions for laboratory experiences and consultations, she<br />

needs to know where her support base is in the group; she needs to know the issues on<br />

which she will negotiate and those on which she will not. She needs to have a good<br />

sense of timing so that she intervenes at moments when her input can be best received.<br />

She needs to be equally unconcerned with being ignored and with being affirmed so that<br />

she can monitor the group climate. She needs to claim ownership for a job well done but<br />

also to acknowledge errors in judgment. She needs to deal with instances in which<br />

sexual attraction biases her responses to other trainers and group members.<br />

Men, also, as they search for new, more collaborative, less competitive behavior<br />

and as they become committed more to openness than to coolness, are likely to be<br />

awkward. Men need to be encouraged to build support systems or begin consciousnessraising<br />

groups in which they can explore these new behaviors. In training settings<br />

particularly, we encourage men to be aware of whether they are operating out of a need<br />

for power and control or a need to get the job done, ignoring other significant needs for<br />

approval, closeness, or spontaneity.<br />

POWER<br />

A paramount issue for women in training is the exercise of power and the acceptance of<br />

the potential conflict that may result. This issue is manifest in both the planning and the<br />

execution of training programs. Women tend to be reticent with colleagues concerning<br />

confrontation or competition in design sessions, even when it is in the best interests of<br />

the client. The same is true when women consultants negotiate a contract with a client<br />

system. They often fail to conceptualize the issues and tend to see an impediment in<br />

terms of a power struggle even though such dynamics are ordinary and frequently useful<br />

components in every organization.<br />

The woman trainer/consultant needs to be clear in her own mind about what is<br />

negotiable in the design and what is not, if she is to act in the best professional interests<br />

of her client and herself. Training designs, of course, may need to be modified after the<br />

program begins; or alternatives may need to be presented from which the participants<br />

can choose. But women particularly, because of their past socialization and the ongoing<br />

reward system in the United States culture, are especially vulnerable to abandoning a<br />

position of strength in order to be charming and conciliatory instead of forceful and<br />

persuasive.<br />

Although ways of dealing with the authority issue vary tremendously among both<br />

male and female trainers, women tend to be reluctant to take charge when that is<br />

appropriate; and they overuse the collaborative/reactive mode even when it is not<br />

appropriate. As women become more comfortable in leadership roles, they will<br />

undoubtedly be able to make judgments based on a correct reading of the situation at<br />

hand.<br />

62 ❘❚<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright © 1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!