26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elationships. Gilligan does not say that one or the other is preferable; she merely<br />

presents the data in the hope of increasing understanding.<br />

Lever (1976) has documented that attachment to and separation from others often<br />

are expressed in the games of children. Males more often play outdoors, in large groups<br />

with a wide age range. Females more often play indoors, in smaller groups with a<br />

narrow age range. Males more often play games that emphasize competition, and they<br />

quarrel more often. Females more often play games that emphasize relationships; and<br />

when quarrels or disputes arise, they often end the games. Furthermore, males play with<br />

enemies and compete with friends, in accordance with the rules. Females play mostly<br />

with friends in smaller, more intimate groups that are more willing to make exceptions<br />

to the rules.<br />

The best-selling book You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in<br />

Conversation (Tannen, 1990) also cites the basic differences between the orientations of<br />

and assumptions made by men and women. These assumptions cause them to view<br />

things differently and, in fact, to communicate in “different languages.” Among other<br />

things, men are concerned with data, and women are concerned with interrelationships<br />

(between things as well as people).<br />

Interpersonal training has revealed that there may be significant differences<br />

between men and women with regard to how they perceive their own work styles, as<br />

well as what they perceive as acceptable work styles in others.<br />

Malcolm Hornby (1992), Director of Delta Management in the U.K., says that in<br />

his interpersonal-skills training programs, he finds that “Men expect themselves to be<br />

seen as drivers, or task-oriented individuals who are tough-minded decision makers with<br />

strong leadership styles. But men see women as more amiable, less assertive, and more<br />

emotionally responsive. This can cause men to regard women as more indecisive and<br />

participative in their leadership approaches.”<br />

Hornby goes on to note that a woman sometimes can be perceived unfavorably by<br />

both sexes if she demonstrates more task-oriented, driving behavior. “She may be seen<br />

as unresponsive, single-minded, aggressive, stubborn, hardnosed, unfeminine,<br />

insensitive, selfish, and threatening,” he says. “Many of these attributes would be seen<br />

as strengths in her male counterparts. But from a woman, it can sometimes break the<br />

man’s paradigm of expected female behavior.”<br />

On the other hand, men who exhibit analytical or emotionally responsive behaviors<br />

may be viewed as indecisive, amiable, chatty, soft, and unbusinesslike. The essential<br />

element in interpersonal skill development is to recognize that all work styles are needed<br />

to make a productive workplace. “When one worker’s behavior does not conform to<br />

another worker’s expectations, it is the worker with the expectations who needs to<br />

demonstrate greater versatility in his or her own work style,” explains Hornby. In other<br />

words, learning to understand and to value other people’s approaches to work can be<br />

invaluable in enhancing overall productivity.<br />

Clearly, if men and women are to work together effectively, they need to<br />

understand some of the basic psychological differences between them; and they need to<br />

424 ❘❚<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright ©1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!