26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

challenged with the question “What is it in my behavior that you choose to allow to<br />

bother you?”<br />

Mind reading refers to drawing conclusions about a person’s thoughts or feelings<br />

without directly communicating with that person. An example is a comment such as “He<br />

won’t say anything because he’s afraid of stating his opinion.” An appropriate response<br />

might be “How do you know he’s afraid?”<br />

The third type of error in logic, unlimited generalization, deals with personal<br />

opinions that are stated as if they pertain to everyone or to the world itself. For example,<br />

the statement “It’s a good idea to share feelings with others” may be countered with the<br />

question “For whom is it a good idea to share feelings with others?”<br />

A fourth and final type of error in logic involves making unwarranted assumptions,<br />

assuming that some condition exists without verifying its existence. A group leader, for<br />

example, might say, “Who will be the first to share personal feelings?” The assumption<br />

behind this statement is that the members are willing to share their feelings. In addition,<br />

statements that are introduced with phrases such as “I wonder,” “I question,” “I’m<br />

curious,” “I know,” and “I understand” often contain embedded commands: “I wonder if<br />

you’re thinking about volunteering to be first.” Many people respond to such commands<br />

by complying, even though they have not been asked specifically to do so. Superficially<br />

the response called for is simply “yes” or “no,” but an implicit command of this kind is<br />

commonly used to control behavior. For instance, if a group leader wishes to tell the<br />

members to rearrange the chairs, he or she might say, “You can rearrange the chairs<br />

now.” Although simply a statement of possibility, this phraseology probably would lead<br />

the group members to respond directly by rearranging the chairs. In general, the<br />

appropriate challenge to this type of error in logic is to ask the speaker whether he or she<br />

is actually requesting that something be done.<br />

THE <strong>COMMUNICATION</strong> MODEL<br />

The Communication Model (see Figure 1) offers an advantage over the Meta Model in<br />

that it is easier to understand, to explain to others, and to use in various settings. It is<br />

based on evidence that everyone uses three types of imagery for representing<br />

information in the process of communication: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. These<br />

“representational systems” are used to help one to recall certain information as well as to<br />

give and receive information. An individual’s principal representational system or<br />

preferred type of imagery can be determined by analyzing a variety of cues, the most<br />

popular of which are specific words and eye movements.<br />

A person whose primary representational system is visual uses many phrases that<br />

are visually oriented, such as “I see what you mean” or “I can see the picture<br />

unfolding.” Specific eye movements also characterize this preference. People with this<br />

type of orientation tend either to look upward or to defocus when trying to<br />

communicate, interpret, or remember something.<br />

98 ❘❚<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright © 1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!