26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTERPRETATION OF “MR. RAT”<br />

It is now easier to understand what may take place in the differing observations of<br />

Figure 1. As “Mr. Rat” is drawn ambiguously, the perceiver is forced to rely on certain<br />

cues in order to establish a meaning for the drawing. If the observer has a set to perceive<br />

a person (that is, in the past he or she has seen similar drawings of a person), then the<br />

cues that the he or she sees give rise to the perception of a person. Similarly, past<br />

experiences with similar drawings of rats give rise to the perception of a rat. Thus, two<br />

observers with two different “sets” perceive two different drawings, even though the<br />

image projected on the retinas of both observers is identical. The difference lies in the<br />

organization of the signals coming from the eye into a pattern that is matched in one<br />

case with the stored pattern of a person and in the other case with the stored pattern of a<br />

rat. It is very unlikely that the differences in perception here are due to differences in<br />

motivation or emotions.<br />

HOW FACTS CAN BE ESTABLISHED<br />

The study of perception shows us that there may be difficulties in agreeing on facts due<br />

to differences in perception. However, people all over the world are able to<br />

communicate with one another and to agree on facts, despite cultural differences.<br />

Following are some suggestions that can be helpful in communicating:<br />

1. Specify in detail the conditions of observation.<br />

2. Describe the observed phenomenon and the boundaries of what is to be<br />

observed.<br />

3. Be on guard for optical illusions and other sources of perceptual distortions—use<br />

instruments and, if possible, several senses—and check for congruency.<br />

4. Repeat observations several times under the same specified conditions.<br />

5. Get confirmations from independent observers—make these observations public.<br />

In practice, these suggestions mean taking careful and cautious observations of a<br />

situation and making adjustments and corrections by “reality testing.” Here, also,<br />

communication and listening skills are indispensable. Such skills can lead two differing<br />

groups of observers—as in the case of “Mr. Rat,” for example—to realize that both sides<br />

can be right and, through accurate descriptions, to see what others see.<br />

FINAL COMMENT<br />

It should be emphasized that what is described in this article relates to “object<br />

perception” or to perception of physical events. However, it is important to be aware<br />

that conflicts between and among people include not only disagreements over<br />

substantive matters, but also antagonisms and personal and emotional differences that<br />

are typical for interdependent individuals (Walton, 1969). Furthermore, it must be<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright © 1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!