26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

❚❘<br />

ANYBODY WITH EYES CAN SEE THE FACTS!<br />

Aharon Kuperman<br />

Disagreements between individuals, especially those who depend on each other in order<br />

to “see” facts, are almost inevitable. Nevertheless, there is a common belief that “facts<br />

are facts.” When a dispute occurs, it should be possible to unearth the “real” facts,<br />

accept them, act accordingly, and thus settle any differences. Stagner, who for many<br />

years was involved in studying industrial conflicts, related how a known labor mediator<br />

liked to say, “There cannot be disagreement about facts, there can only be ignorance of<br />

them” (1956, p. 15). It is questionable, however, whether this belief rests on a firm<br />

foundation. The “facts” are not always that simple.<br />

THE CASE OF “MR. RAT”<br />

Figure 1 will give us a glimpse of what may be entailed in attempting to establish facts<br />

that can plainly be accepted by all who look. If the drawing in Figure 1 is shown to a<br />

group of people and each person is asked to describe what he or she sees, some<br />

individuals, without any trace of doubt or hesitation, will say, “A profile of a bald man<br />

with eyeglasses and a hooked nose.” Other observers, with no less confidence, will<br />

promptly respond, “A rat!” One might wonder how both responses could be right—or<br />

whether anybody needed an eye examination or one group was lying. It is easy to<br />

imagine the arguments between the two groups of observers after the picture is<br />

withdrawn.<br />

Situations such as that illustrated by “Mr. Rat” are not as infrequent as they may<br />

appear. Stagner claims that many industrial conflicts revolve around the differences that<br />

management and labor see in the facts. If this is so, we might well wonder how facts can<br />

be established. It is not a new problem. The thorny question of the relationship between<br />

the “real” world and the world as it appears in our experiences has concerned the human<br />

race throughout history. Answers to such questions are prerequisites for gaining reliable<br />

and valid knowledge about the world in general.<br />

PERCEPTION<br />

In modern psychology, issues of this kind are dealt with under the heading of<br />

“perception,” a field that deals with the processes by which human beings establish and<br />

maintain contact with their environment. Since Locke (An Essay Concerning Human<br />

Originally published in The 1979 Annual Handbook for Group Facilitators by John E. Jones and J. William Pfeiffer (Eds.), San Diego,<br />

CA: Pfeffer & Company.<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright © 1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!