26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

■ Benchmarking is “. . . the process of identifying, understanding and adapting<br />

outstanding practices and processes from organizations anywhere in the world to<br />

help your organization improve its performance” (O’Dell, 1994).<br />

■ Ford Motor Company has a structured approach for learning from others and<br />

applying that knowledge; 3M, a tool to search for enablers that allow a company<br />

to perform at a best-in-class level in a business process; AT&T Benchmark<br />

Group, the continuous process of measuring current business operations and<br />

comparing them to best-in-class companies.<br />

Benchmarking targets key areas within a company, department, or unit and focuses<br />

on jobs that can be improved. This process identifies and studies the best practices<br />

others use in these same areas, and it implements new processes and systems to increase<br />

quality or productivity or to make other major improvements.<br />

Benchmarking provides a methodology that can be tied to any financial or<br />

nonfinancial measure. Eccles (1991) believes that benchmarking has a transforming<br />

effect on managerial mind-sets and perspectives. For instance, in successful<br />

“organizations of the future,” new mind-sets and models that reflect shared<br />

understandings of interrelationships and patterns of change will replace linear, shortterm<br />

thinking (Senge, 1990). Benchmarking these somewhat intangible concepts will be<br />

a challenge.<br />

The main types of benchmarking are<br />

■ Internal or operational: the most common type, an in-depth, internal analysis<br />

and comparison of an organization’s functional operations in critical success<br />

areas. An organization’s high performing units or functions known to be<br />

performed well can be benchmarked by other units within the same organization.<br />

■ Competitive: competitors and/or others are identified in industries that<br />

demonstrate high-level performance in some area, like chip manufacture, and<br />

then the organization’s own performance is compared to theirs (Eccles, 1991).<br />

■ Strategic: critical success factors or outstanding business strategies in any<br />

industry are identified, regardless of the nature of products or services.<br />

Overall, benchmarking requires a high level of self-knowledge, clear objectives,<br />

and customer awareness. Without appropriate mechanisms to measure performance and<br />

implement change anywhere in the company, most benchmarking efforts will fail<br />

(Mittelstaedt, 1992).<br />

Quality<br />

Definition<br />

Many people define quality in terms of their work world. Definitions for quality must<br />

adequately represent the strong emphasis on service areas. Estimates of the percentage<br />

of service workers in the U.S. range from seventy to nearly ninety percent. Some people<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright ©1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 453

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!