26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 3 (continued). Structural Interventions That Encourage Mentoring<br />

Intervention Alternative Methods Major Advantages Major Disadvantages<br />

Modify<br />

Performance<br />

Management<br />

Systems<br />

1. Introduce performance<br />

appraisal, MBO, and<br />

developmental planning<br />

processes if they do not<br />

exist.<br />

2. Offer educational programs<br />

on the rationale and skills<br />

required for each system.<br />

Provides a forum for<br />

mentoring activities,<br />

including coaching,<br />

counseling, role modeling,<br />

and sponsorship.<br />

Is likely to engender<br />

considerable resistance,<br />

particularly without<br />

adequate skill training.<br />

Changes attitudes and<br />

enhances interpersonal<br />

skills.<br />

Will be viewed with<br />

skepticism unless systems<br />

are endorsed by senior<br />

management.<br />

3. Allow other than immediate<br />

supervisors to provide<br />

mentoring functions.<br />

Voluntary participation<br />

encourages positive<br />

interaction.<br />

May threaten immediate<br />

supervisors.<br />

Introduce a<br />

Formal<br />

Mentoring<br />

Program<br />

1. Set up pairs of colleagues<br />

who are expected to build<br />

relationships that provide<br />

mentoring functions.<br />

Ensures pairing and<br />

mentoring as assigned.<br />

People may feel coerced<br />

and confused or anxious<br />

about their<br />

responsibilities;<br />

destructive dynamics may<br />

emerge.<br />

2. Define a target populations<br />

for whom formalized<br />

relationships should be<br />

established and provide a<br />

process for identifying and<br />

matching pairs.<br />

3. Set up procedures for<br />

monitoring the pairs and<br />

providing feedback to the<br />

organization.<br />

4. Offer educational<br />

opportunities to aid<br />

members in participating<br />

effectively in the program.<br />

Increases the likelihood<br />

that matches will work<br />

because they are based<br />

on similar values,<br />

interests, and<br />

interpersonal styles.<br />

Those who are not<br />

selected are likely to feel<br />

deprived, resentful, and<br />

increasingly pessimistic<br />

about their futures.<br />

Provides support the pairs<br />

and a vehicle for ending<br />

relationships that do no<br />

work.<br />

Evaluation can put people<br />

in the program on the<br />

defensive.<br />

Changes attitudes and<br />

builds requisite<br />

interpersonal skills,<br />

preparing people to initiate<br />

and manage the new<br />

relationships<br />

Some volunteers may be<br />

ill suited for their new<br />

responsibilities.<br />

Modifying the Reward System<br />

The reward system has tremendous impact on behavior because pay and promotion<br />

issues are so important to people (Beer, 1980; Lawler, 1977). In most organizations, this<br />

system is designed to reward performance and potential related to bottom-line results.<br />

There are several ways in which a reward system can be modified to encourage<br />

relationship-building activities. Decisions about pay increases and promotion can be<br />

based not only on financial results but also on how well people develop subordinates<br />

and how well they build relationships with colleagues. Feedback from peers and<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright ©1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 259

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!