26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

uilt on shared expectations and knowledge of suppliers and customers<br />

incorporate common concepts and standards. This helps cement a foundation for<br />

developing contracts, building partnerships, and forming alliances.<br />

2. To develop a common language that everyone throughout the organization<br />

understands. It should provide standard, base terms that unify concepts and<br />

reduce disagreement. The only universal language of business is financial<br />

accounting (Senge, 1990). Using a language that is primarily numeric is a<br />

beginning point, but not an effective way to communicate complex issues.<br />

Descriptive definitions can be used to supplement the numeric definitions or<br />

standards.<br />

3. To operationalize concepts in a given area or unit to ensure the uniformity of<br />

scope, content, or level of complexity, for instance. These procedures provide a<br />

unified framework to examine factors affecting the design, development, and<br />

provision of products and services. Such standardization is extremely beneficial<br />

when working with suppliers and partners who may be next door or around the<br />

world. This common framework helps facilitate two-way communication. The<br />

ultimate goal is to create a set of definitions that enhance understanding and<br />

communication and streamline business interactions, yet provide a strong base<br />

for quality.<br />

4. To fine-tune existing definitions of key activities and results that have been<br />

benchmarked, thereby increasing the precision, flexibility, and scope of<br />

definitions in numerous product and service areas. The goal is to enhance end<br />

user and/or customer satisfaction and ultimately increase quality and<br />

productivity.<br />

5. To make it possible to analyze work methods and accomplishments by grouping<br />

work done on the job into areas that describe various types and levels of work<br />

activities, such as clerical, support, professional, specialist, or knowledge<br />

workers. Separate operational definitions could be used for each category. This<br />

process could be applied to analyzing jobs, developing job assignments, doing<br />

performance appraisals, and cross-training.<br />

6. To clarify major job objectives in order to make it easier to determine and<br />

describe job-related standards for quality. Since every person does his or her job<br />

in a slightly different manner, it is critical to recognize and document<br />

uniquenesses or individual differences and accompanying standards for quality.<br />

7. To describe the fine points of products, processes, and services. When common<br />

terms emerge, all parties experience a feeling of unity. This process works well<br />

when creating ground rules for a new project, when current projects start to bog<br />

down, or when it is necessary to clarify meanings of concepts and processes to<br />

reach consensus.<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright ©1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 449

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!