26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Style Blind Spots<br />

The bigger one’s blind spot, the more one tends to overuse one’s strong-suit style and to<br />

be oblivious to the need to match styles with someone else on a markedly different<br />

wavelength. People get along best with others who are on their wavelength: Like attracts<br />

like. Thus, thinkers will tend to gravitate together, producing a group with tremendous<br />

ability to handle analytical problems; as all group members have strongly developed<br />

thinking skills, they enhance one another’s effectiveness. While such a group builds an<br />

enviable record for its success in coping with analytical problems, sooner or later it will<br />

be handed a problem that calls for skills in intuition or empathy—and then disaster can<br />

very well result. It is not just that the group’s skills do not match the skills the problem<br />

calls for; worse, “groupthink” (Janis, 1972) can result, as the group’s mutually shared<br />

blind spots increase its members’ tendency not to use their weak styles, which in this<br />

case would be more appropriate.<br />

APPLICATIONS OF THE FOUR-<strong>COMMUNICATION</strong>-STYLES<br />

APPROACH<br />

Knowledge about stylistic preferences has been used to hamstring juries. If, by<br />

questioning, it is possible to eliminate all the “feelers” from a jury, the group that results<br />

will not be able to achieve consensus on any issue that is at all emotional or<br />

controversial.<br />

Style Flexing<br />

The most frequent use of expertise in these four communication styles is “style flexing.”<br />

This involves:<br />

■ Knowing your own most and least favored styles, in stress and nonstress<br />

situations alike;<br />

■ Knowing how you come across to others in either situation;<br />

■ Learning how to identify the dominant style of any person(s) to whom you may<br />

be talking; and<br />

■ Learning how to switch your style so as to get on the same wavelength as your<br />

conversational partner(s).<br />

Team Building<br />

The next most-frequent use of expertise in this approach is in team building. It is quite<br />

unusual to be a “team in one” (equally strong in all four styles both under stress and<br />

nonstress conditions). Most of us have overdeveloped some styles and underdeveloped<br />

others, but there are some different strong-suit styles that seem to go well together—<br />

feelers and thinkers in growth groups, for instance. The thinkers can dispassionately<br />

84 ❘❚<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright © 1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!