26.10.2014 Views

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

„‚ CONDITIONS THAT HINDER EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Similarly, performance appraisal and management by objectives (MBO) systems<br />

have the potential to reinforce a number of the mentoring functions by providing forums<br />

for discussion of performance, objectives, and accomplishments. For the subordinate, a<br />

performance appraisal provides an opportunity to receive coaching and feedback. The<br />

supervisor is given a structure in which to provide these important developmental<br />

functions and is trained in how to do so. Unfortunately, these conditions do not exist in<br />

many organizations.<br />

Obstacle 4: The culture of the organization—through its shared values, systems of<br />

informal rules and rituals, and the behavior of its leaders—labels mentoring, and<br />

relationships in general, as nonessential. Like the reward system, the culture<br />

significantly affects whether people will invest time in developing relationships that<br />

support personal and professional growth (Deal & Kennedy, 1982). An organization<br />

whose leaders provide mentoring functions down the line, reward subordinates for<br />

developing their subordinates, and model effective mentoring behaviors, is likely to<br />

have a reward system that values relationships and developmental activities.<br />

Equally important are the value messages conveyed by the culture about what types<br />

of communication are legitimate, the degree to which people can trust one another<br />

(particularly at different hierarchical levels), the extent to which openness and trust are<br />

valued and respected, and so on. Meaningful coaching, counseling, friendship, and role<br />

modeling are almost impossible in a situation characterized by low trust and minimal or<br />

purely political communication.<br />

It is not difficult to assess how the organizational culture encourages or discourages<br />

mentoring. Observations of communication patterns and interviews with organizational<br />

members can provide insight about how the culture affects relationships.<br />

Most organizations have not consciously assessed their cultures in relation to<br />

mentoring. Those that have generally have emphasized the importance of sponsorship<br />

and mentoring for those who have been identified as having high potential for<br />

managerial responsibilities (“An ‘Old Girl Network’ Is Born,” Business Week, 1978;<br />

Collins & Scott, 1978). Leaders of organizations consciously model what they consider<br />

to be appropriate behavior, and newcomers with high potential are linked with senior<br />

managers who are expected to provide a variety of mentoring functions. Such mentoring<br />

for an elite group rather than for a wide range of organizational members creates a<br />

significant loss for the organization.<br />

The culture that most severely discourages mentoring is the one in which<br />

relationships are considered distractions from the work. Leaders model a results<br />

orientation, inquire only about the bottom line, and invest little time or energy in talking<br />

with employees about their jobs or personal lives. Concerns for efficiency, high<br />

production, and maximum use of technical resources do not include concern for the<br />

quality of work life or the development of human resources. Thus, people feel<br />

discounted and disaffected, the quality of communication and the levels of trust are low,<br />

and supportive relationships are almost nonexistent.<br />

The Pfeiffer Library Volume 6, 2nd Edition. Copyright ©1998 Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer ❚❘ 251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!