28.10.2014 Views

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 25: ‘Garbo’ polypropylene trash can for Umbra, 1996. Karim Rashid<br />

The aim of this process was to indicate common properties of the objects and<br />

identify relationships between ‘types’ of objects. This involved a process of<br />

‘transcoding’ (<strong>James</strong>on, 1981, p.40) – the invention and strategic application of<br />

a set of terms to analyse and articulate diverse types of objects. This was done<br />

to reveal an underlying structure of the field by grouping the objects into<br />

classifications. For the basis of this categorisation specific properties and<br />

attributes were recorded for each of the objects regardless of the object’s source<br />

or domain of origin. The researcher experimented with different categorisations<br />

to allow different groupings to form. This was repeated many times to redefine<br />

the category boundaries and reveal a systematic structure of the field. This was<br />

developed to bring consistency to the framework of analysis.<br />

3.3 A survey of international practitioners<br />

The researcher gathered data from a survey of practitioners that use computerbased<br />

design and fabrication tools from across the 3D disciplines of art and<br />

design. The purpose of this survey was: to develop an understanding of the<br />

current use of these technologies in art and design; establish how practitioners<br />

think about and engage with these technologies; and generate an understanding<br />

of how practitioners relate to and engage with other art and design disciplines.<br />

Fifty-seven practitioners were contacted by email and invited to answer fifteen<br />

questions - all responses were collected electronically via a web-based<br />

application 48 . After collection this data was aggregated so a single practitioner’s<br />

responses and the collected responses of all practitioners could be viewed and<br />

compared.<br />

48 http://www.surveymonkey.com/<br />

- 109 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!