28.10.2014 Views

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.5 A public exhibition and symposium<br />

While there are aspects of this research that can be explored through published<br />

material - some of the most important information was likely to emerge in<br />

discussion with practitioners. It was intended that through conducting a public<br />

exhibition the researcher would: obtain specific qualitative information from a<br />

sample of contemporary practitioners; obtain general information relevant to<br />

this <strong>thesis</strong>; and gain insights by making comparisons between qualitative<br />

statements made by practitioners.<br />

The researcher secured £30,000 from Arts Council England (ACE) and £5,000<br />

from the Manchester Institute for Research and Innovation in Art and Design<br />

(MIRIAD) to develop an exhibition titled ‘Perimeters, Boundaries and Borders’<br />

(PBB) and a symposium about how computer-based tools are impacting across<br />

the 3D art and design disciplines. This exhibition ran from 29 th September –<br />

21 st October, 2006 in Lancaster. The exhibition venue (CityLab) was a group of<br />

historic buildings in the centre of Lancaster that had been newly redeveloped to<br />

provide one thousand five hundred square metres of new office space for<br />

technology-based start-up businesses.<br />

The exhibition and symposium allowed the researcher to expose the wider<br />

public and peers to the research proposition. Case studies were developed<br />

around participants in the exhibition to provide an opportunity to capture<br />

qualitative statements by surveys and interviews (see section 4.5.4). Visitor’s<br />

experiences of the exhibition were captured by exit surveys (see section 4.5.5).<br />

Interviews were also conducted with the project partners (see section 4.5.6).<br />

References to the exhibition in print and online were collected by the researcher<br />

(see section 4.5.7). The purpose of collecting these press citations was to note<br />

the disciplinary perspectives that regard works to be of interest to see which<br />

works that were most discussed and by which disciplinary communities.<br />

A few of the participants 51 in the exhibition were invited to present at a<br />

symposium based on the contribution they would potentially make to the<br />

discussion, previous experience of presentations they had given and their<br />

availability on the day of the symposium. These events allowed the researcher<br />

51 Tavs Jorgensen Aoife Ludlow, Justin <strong>Marshall</strong>, Lionel T. Dean and Human Beans.<br />

- 113 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!