28.10.2014 Views

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“‘FutureFactories’ acts to blur distinctions between craft and design. If<br />

the focus of ‘craft’ is taken to be the conception of form leading to one-off<br />

production; and ‘design’ is taken to be concerned with the conception of<br />

form leading to a specification for large-scale manufacture, then the<br />

distinction between a craftsperson and a designer is clear… In this<br />

context, the definitions of ‘craft’ and ‘design’ as discrete processes<br />

become hopelessly blurred, intertwined, inextricable, and as a result,<br />

meaningless.” (Atkinson, 2003, p.28-29)<br />

“Obviously, ‘FutureFactories’ is not a suitable model for the production of<br />

complex technological objects (at least not yet). But the design thinking<br />

behind it, and the manufacturing system proposed fits far more<br />

comfortably within the tenets of post modernism, and the drive for<br />

individuality associated with that philosophy.” (Atkinson and Dean<br />

2003)<br />

2.7.6 Democratised production<br />

In ‘Democratizing Innovation’ Eric von Hippel (2005) argues that changes in<br />

information and communication technologies are increasingly giving users the<br />

tools (for example access to modifiable content placed in the public domain) to<br />

innovate for themselves and create the next generation of commodities and<br />

services. Hippel claims that often traditional models of innovation<br />

(manufacturer-centric) have been left behind by the distributive capabilities<br />

brought about by technological change (user-centric) and are therefore largely<br />

ineffective. These assertions are backed up with extensive empirical evidence in<br />

the form of graphs and statistics. However for this study some of Hippel’s ideas<br />

and insights are more relevant.<br />

Hippel’s main proposition is the most effective source of innovation is<br />

increasingly the users of products or services, not their producers or providers.<br />

Users have a better idea of what they value from a product or service. Therefore<br />

producers and providers should develop systematic methods to tap into and<br />

encourage these user-driven improvements. The discussion of this user-centric<br />

approach in the book is restricted to niche applications which are subsequently<br />

extrapolated to indicate these methods could be applied to other mass areas of<br />

activity.<br />

Hippel states these user-driven innovations are primarily developed by ‘lead<br />

users’ which are at the cutting edge of important market trends - the needs they<br />

- 65 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!