28.10.2014 Views

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Foucault (1977, p.113-138) discusses the idea of a ‘transdiscursive position’ -<br />

those who are initiators of discursive practices, not just of individual texts.<br />

Fundamental to this study, is the notion of cross-disciplinarity as a means to<br />

make meaningful evaluations of a new order of object across domain-specific<br />

boundaries. We have already seen in Christiane Paul’s essay ‘Fluid Borders: The<br />

Aesthetic Evolution of Digital Sculpture’ (1999) that a new sense of disciplinary<br />

boundary shifting and hybrid art forms have been part of the discourse<br />

surrounding the activity of practitioners seeking to re-examine object making<br />

using computer-based design and fabrication tools (see section 2.3). This<br />

section of the review looks at the nature of how the use of design computing<br />

might let us look again at the nature of a practice driven by these technologies.<br />

If we suggest that this presents a new territory and the potential hybridity<br />

between conventional subject domains we must explore specifically how this<br />

might occur and what implications it might have.<br />

2.8.1 Modes of knowledge production<br />

In ‘The new production of knowledge’ published in 1994 Michael Gibbons and<br />

his co-authors introduced the notion of mode 2 research, which is newly<br />

emerging, context-driven, problem-focused and interdisciplinary knowledge<br />

production. This he and his colleagues distinguished from traditional mode 1<br />

research, which is academic, investigator-initiated and discipline-based<br />

(Gibbons et al, 1994).<br />

Gibbons, et al categorise three types of research beyond standard disciplinarity.<br />

These are: ‘multi’, ‘inter’ and ‘trans’ disciplinarity. Multidisciplinary research is<br />

characterised by the autonomy of the various disciplines involved whose<br />

theoretical structures are not changed by the new work. This can be viewed as<br />

cross-disciplinary cooperation within which the different disciplinary<br />

perspectives are maintained. Interdisciplinary research is characterised by the<br />

explicit formulation of discipline-transcending theoretical structures such as<br />

terminology or a common methodology. This can be viewed as crossdisciplinary<br />

cooperation within which a common framework is shared by the<br />

different disciplines in relation to their individual themes. Transdisciplinary<br />

research is based on a common theoretical understanding accompanied by a<br />

mutual interpenetration of disciplinary epistemologies. This can be viewed as<br />

- 69 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!