28.10.2014 Views

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The number of critical reviews of the ‘PBB’ exhibition was disappointing. The<br />

fact the exhibition was in a creative industries centre in Lancaster most likely<br />

played a role in this. However, the researcher views the fact that Tavs<br />

Jørgensen’s ‘Motion in Form’ glass bowl forms were featured on Rhizome.org<br />

(an online platform for the global new media art community) as one of the<br />

major accomplishments of the exhibition. The nature of these objects is so<br />

rooted in traditional craft practice the fact they would be of interest to this<br />

community was surprising. This stands as an indication that innovative<br />

production methods can provide alternate standards to established discourses.<br />

In terms of key achievements the new partnership with folly was one of the most<br />

successful aspects of this programme of events. Issues that arose were resolved<br />

to Fast-uk’s satisfaction in a timely manner. For example, during the period just<br />

before the show was due to open communication between Fast-uk and folly ran<br />

into some difficulties and the researcher had to remind folly that as the primary<br />

source of funding for ‘PBB’ Fast-uk wished to be credited as per the consultant’s<br />

agreement for project management. This issue had arisen due to the rapid<br />

expansion in folly personnel after the project had already begun (compounded<br />

by the roles of ‘partner’ and ‘consultant’ being blurred). In general however, the<br />

proactive attitude, enthusiasm and professionalism of folly’s staff were a major<br />

contributing factor to the success of the exhibition, symposium and workshop.<br />

The researcher had also attempted to create links between the project and<br />

Lancaster University. To this end the researcher prepared a grant application to<br />

the AHRC Case for Support fund for the ‘PBB’ symposium and a catalogue<br />

(<strong>Marshall</strong>, 2008) for the exhibition. However, there was no institutional<br />

support for this application from Lancaster Institute for the Contemporary Arts<br />

(LICA) and it was abandoned. We considered it a loss to the project and a<br />

missed opportunity that Lancaster University was not involved.<br />

5.5.1 Symposium<br />

The ‘Perimeters, Boundaries and Borders’ symposium (see Appendix I for<br />

transcript) brought together artists, designers, architects, craft makers,<br />

academics, students and others to talk about the ‘PBB’ exhibition and discuss<br />

how computer-based design and fabrication tools have impacted on creative<br />

practice and production methods. Those in attendance heard about changes<br />

- 285 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!