28.10.2014 Views

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

digital voice recorder. Each partner interviewed was aware their voice would be<br />

recorded. A copy of the questions was given to each practitioner before the<br />

interview and they had the opportunity to review them and ask any questions.<br />

The interviews were conducted in casual settings and the practitioners were<br />

encouraged to go off-topic if something occurred to them. However, both<br />

partners were asked the same questions by the researcher in a standardised<br />

order. The interviewer explained aspects of the questions the interviewee did<br />

not understand or found confusing but whenever issues of terminology arose<br />

the interviewee was asked to respond from their own understanding of the term.<br />

Each interview was transcribed by a third-party transcription service, proofed<br />

by the researcher and approved by the partners. The results of these interviews<br />

are presented in section 4.5.6.<br />

3.6 Development of analytical models<br />

This research seeks to critically map how the use of computer-based tools<br />

impact on current disciplinary boundaries. The researcher is actively trying to<br />

develop critical language by which to better compare diverse objects across<br />

disciplines. To draw distinctions between projects across disciplinary<br />

boundaries the researcher has been working on proposed models of the<br />

relationships between:<br />

• the integration of computer-based technologies and the objects produced<br />

by practitioners using them<br />

• various types of cross-disciplinary or hybrid art and design practice<br />

It was intended these would allow the researcher to present the findings of the<br />

study and develop the critical language, criteria and framework of analysis to a<br />

wider context.<br />

3.6.1 Technology adoption models<br />

As previously stated by Harrod (2002) and Lynn (Lynn and Rashid, 2003) the<br />

introduction of new technologies can disrupt and therefore change the way<br />

practitioners perform tasks. Since this research is concerned with use of<br />

computer-based design and fabrication tools it is important to consider a<br />

general theoretical understanding of the adoption of these technologies.<br />

Björnsson, Shariq & Taylor (2003) have conducted research at Stanford<br />

University into the adoption of new technologies in the architecture,<br />

- 118 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!