John James Marshall thesis.pdf - OpenAIR @ RGU - Robert Gordon ...

innovation within technology, not in use but in technology. So at the exhibition I
felt that it works together with all the other pieces. The range was wider than I
thought.
8. Did the exhibition live up to your expectations?
Yes, I think so.
9. Were you happy with the way your work was displayed?
In the end yes, it could have been more appealing, related to how it was in
London before, but that was the perfect architecture for the piece. The
architecture as an office environment wasn’t really giving too much possibilities,
but all the pieces had to fight with that situation. Probably mine was one of the
ones that had more difficulty, but when I walked through the exhibition in the
end I was happy.
10. What could have been done better?
I didn’t look at the rooms specifically to see what other room would have been
better, but the room we were in, the windows were quite tricky to …they were
too high, so I made all kinds of decisions in the room, but the one I was in was
ok, but it could have been more precise. Going through the exhibitions, looking
inside all the rooms, it worked. I don’t know if there would have been a better
room. It didn’t really matter in the end.
11. In your opinion, what was the strongest work in the exhibition
and why?
Difficult to pick one because I felt that the level was quite…the same. Objectively
there wasn’t one which really flashed out, which I thought was good for an
exhibition like that. Just a personal…there was different single things abut
single pieces that flashed out for me. The way the Wifi piece was using
information to do something with it – that was very good quality of
demonstrating something. I wasn’t sure about the Wifi signal in general to use it
for something like that, but the way everything was produced from that concept
on was very good.
- 394 -