21.01.2015 Views

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hwy 2 / Lundstrom: Restripe and widen approaches to ac<strong>com</strong>modate exclusive NB and SB right<br />

turn lanes.<br />

Project Proportional Share: 29.4%<br />

Resulting LOS & Delay (sec): F/179.6<br />

Hwy 2 / Garfield: Optimize signal timing.<br />

Project Proportional Share: 23.7%<br />

Resulting LOS & Delay (sec): D/52.5<br />

Hwy 2 / Hayford: Optimize signal timing and consider converting the inside SB thru land to a<br />

2 nd SB left turn lane. Widen the EB and NB approaches for exclusive right turn lanes. Restripe<br />

the wide paved median for a 2 nd WB left turn lane. Add 2 nd NB left turn lane. Alternatively, add<br />

a 2 nd NB left turn lane and a WB auxiliary lane.<br />

Project Proportional Share: 18.0%<br />

Resulting LOS & Delay (sec): F/97.1 / D/51.3 (alternative)<br />

Craig / SR 902: Install traffic signal or consider installation of a roundabout.<br />

Project Proportional Share: 31.1%<br />

Resulting LOS & Delay (sec): B/17.6 / B/10.4 (roundabout)<br />

Hwy 2 / Middle Driveway: Install traffic signal and approach improvements (SB Middle<br />

Driveway); install a WB right turn lane. Alternatively, consider installation of a roundabout.<br />

Project Proportional Share: 100%<br />

Resulting LOS & Delay (sec): D/45.4 / E/61.3 (roundabout<br />

<br />

Craig / Sixth Ave.: Widen the intersection approach to provide and exclusive NB right turn lane.<br />

Project Proportional Share: 38.0%<br />

Resulting LOS & Delay (sec): D/28.8<br />

Suggested intersection lane geometry for Alt. 1, PH3 (buildout conditions) at Middle Dwy./Hwy.2 and<br />

Craig Rd./Hwy.2 can be seen on Figure 24. Note that at the design stage consideration of or<br />

ac<strong>com</strong>modation for a future 4 th leg (southerly leg) of the Middle Dwy./Hwy 2 should be examined.<br />

Alternative 2<br />

Re<strong>com</strong>mended improvements are summarized below along with the estimated proportional fair share<br />

contribution.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Hwy 2 / Craig: Install traffic signal and widen the NB and SB approaches to provide and<br />

exclusive left turn lane. Alternatively, consider installation of a roundabout.<br />

Project Proportional Share: 34.2%<br />

Resulting LOS & Delay (sec): C/31.6 / A/7.8<br />

Hwy 2 / Hayford: Optimize signal timing and convert the inside SB thru lane to a 2 nd SB left<br />

turn lane.<br />

Project Proportional Share: 15.8%<br />

Resulting LOS & Delay (sec): D/45.9<br />

Craig / SR 902: Install traffic signal or consider installation of a roundabout.<br />

Project Proportional Share: 23.7%<br />

Resulting LOS & Delay (sec): B/15.6 / A/8.6 (roundabout)<br />

Hwy 2 / Middle Driveway: Install traffic signal and approach improvements (SB Middle<br />

Driveway); install a WB right turn lane. Alternatively, consider installation of a roundabout.<br />

Project Proportional Share: 100%<br />

Resulting LOS & Delay (sec): C/31.1 / A/9.8 (roundabout)<br />

West Plains Development – Spokane Tribe Page | 6<br />

<strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> April 28, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!