21.01.2015 Views

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.3 Operational <strong>Analysis</strong> and Level of Service - 2012 Pipeline Conditions<br />

The Year 2012 pipeline traffic volumes used for this analysis scenario are shown in Figure 6.<br />

Operational analysis results are summarized in the table below.<br />

INTERSECTION<br />

Table 4. Level of Service for Year 2012 Pipeline PM Peak Hour Conditions<br />

(S)ignalized<br />

(U)nsignalized<br />

Critical<br />

Movement By<br />

Approach<br />

Peak hour Level of Service (LOS)<br />

PM Peak Hour<br />

Delay<br />

Hwy. 2 at Craig Rd. U SB LTR 75.0 F<br />

Hwy. 2 at Lundstrom St. U NB LTR 23.7 C<br />

Hwy. 2 at Lawson St. S -- 18.9 B<br />

Hwy. 2 at Garfield St. S -- 16.9 B<br />

Hwy. 2 at Hayford Rd. S -- 41.4 D<br />

Craig Rd. at Deno Rd. U EB LTR 9.4 A<br />

Craig Rd. at McFarlane St. U WB LTR 10.8 B<br />

Craig Rd. at Thorpe Rd. East U SB LR 9.0 A<br />

Craig Rd. at Thorpe Rd. West U NB LR 9.0 A<br />

Craig Rd. at SR 902 U SB LTR 34.5 D<br />

Hwy. 2 at Fairchild AFB S -- 15.8 B<br />

Craig Rd. / 6 th Ave. U WB Lt. 10.1 B<br />

As shown in Table 4, the Hwy 2/Craig Rd. intersection is expected to have a failing LOS of F under 2012<br />

Background conditions.<br />

LOS<br />

West Plains Development – Spokane Tribe Page | 38<br />

<strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> April 28, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!