21.01.2015 Views

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity <strong>Analysis</strong><br />

4: Hwy. 2 & Garfield St. 2/14/2011<br />

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR<br />

Lane Configurations<br />

Volume (vph) 141 2097 17 46 2168 266 52 29 118 215 23 110<br />

Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900<br />

Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0<br />

Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00<br />

Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85<br />

Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.96 1.00<br />

Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3570 1787 3574 1599 1691 1818 1615<br />

Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.51 1.00<br />

Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 3570 1787 3574 1599 1188 978 1615<br />

Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93<br />

Adj. Flow (vph) 152 2255 18 49 2331 286 56 31 127 231 25 118<br />

RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 40 0 0 0 55<br />

Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 2273 0 49 2331 214 0 174 0 0 256 63<br />

Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0%<br />

Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm<br />

Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8<br />

Permitted Phases 2 4 8 8<br />

Actuated Green, G (s) 9.5 76.9 3.9 71.3 71.3 36.2 36.2 36.2<br />

Effective Green, g (s) 9.5 76.9 3.9 71.3 71.3 36.2 36.2 36.2<br />

Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.58 0.03 0.54 0.54 0.27 0.27 0.27<br />

Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0<br />

Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0<br />

Lane Grp Cap (vph) 128 2064 52 1916 857 323 266 440<br />

v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 c0.64 0.03 c0.65<br />

v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.15 c0.26 0.04<br />

v/c Ratio 1.19 1.10 0.94 1.22 0.25 0.54 0.96 0.14<br />

Uniform Delay, d1 61.8 28.0 64.4 30.9 16.5 41.3 47.7 36.7<br />

Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00<br />

Incremental Delay, d2 138.6 53.5 102.9 102.5 0.2 1.7 44.6 0.2<br />

Delay (s) 200.3 81.6 167.4 133.3 16.7 43.0 92.3 36.8<br />

Level of Service F F F F B D F D<br />

Approach Delay (s) 89.0 121.4 43.0 74.8<br />

Approach LOS F F D E<br />

Intersection Summary<br />

HCM Average Control Delay 101.6 HCM Level of Service F<br />

HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.19<br />

Actuated Cycle Length (s) 133.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.5<br />

Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.0% ICU Level of Service H<br />

<strong>Analysis</strong> Period (min) 15<br />

Description: Optimized<br />

c Critical Lane Group<br />

West Plains Development <strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> 5:00 pm 2/8/2011 2032 Alternative 3 Buildout<br />

Synchro 7 - Report<br />

Page 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!