Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

Recommendations

Info

Table ES- 2. Operational Analysis Summary-Existing Conditions and Pipeline Project Scenarios Hwy. 2 / Craig Rd. INTERSECTION Hwy. 2 / Lundstrom St. Hwy. 2 / Lawson St. Existing PM Peak CM = NBLTR LOS = D Delay = 27.3 CM = NBLTR LOS = C Delay = 21.0 LOS = B Delay = 15.1 2012 PM Peak Pipeline CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = 75.0 CM = NBLTR LOS = C Delay = 23.7 LOS = B Delay = 18.9 2015 PM Peak Pipeline CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = 806.7 CM = NBLTR LOS = D Delay = 28.7 LOS = B Delay = 20.1 2019 PM Peak Pipeline CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = * CM = NBLTR LOS = E Delay = 42.8 LOS = C Delay = 23.1 2032 PM Peak Pipeline CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = * CM = NBLTR LOS = F Delay = 109.6 LOS = C Delay = 29.9 Hwy. 2 / Garfield St. LOS = B Delay = 15.5 LOS = B Delay = 16.9 LOS = C Delay = 21.9 LOS = C Delay = 29.6 LOS = E Delay = 58.7 Hwy. 2 / Hayford Rd. Craig Rd. / Deno Rd. Craig Rd. / McFarlane St. Craig Rd. / Thorpe Rd. East Craig Rd. / Thorpe Rd. West Craig Rd. / SR 902 Hwy. 2 / Fairchild AFB. Craig Rd. / 6 th Ave. LOS = D Delay = 38.9 CM = EBLTR LOS = A Delay = 9.3 CM = WBLTR LOS = B Delay = 10.8 CM = SBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = NBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = SBLTR LOS = D Delay = 34.5 LOS = B Delay = 14.6 -- LOS = D Delay = 41.4 CM = EBLTR LOS = A Delay = 9.4 CM = WBLTR LOS = B Delay = 10.8 CM = SBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = NBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = SBLTR LOS = D Delay = 34.5 LOS = B Delay = 15.8 CM = WBL LOS = B Delay = 10.1 LOS = D Delay = 44.5 CM = EBLTR LOS = A Delay = 9.4 CM = WBLTR LOS = B Delay = 10.9 CM = SBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = NBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = SBLTR LOS = E Delay = 36.4 LOS = B Delay = 17.4 CM = WBL LOS = B Delay = 11.6 LOS = E Delay = 66.6 CM = EBLTR LOS = A Delay = 9.4 CM = WBLTR LOS = B Delay = 10.9 CM = SBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.1 CM = NBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = SBLTR LOS = E Delay = 37.8 LOS = C Delay = 21.4 CM = WBL LOS = C Delay = 24.3 LOS = F Delay = 150.3 CM = EBLTR LOS = A Delay = 9.5 CM = WBLTR LOS = B Delay = 11.8 CM = SBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.3 CM = NBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.3 CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = 155.4 LOS = D Delay = 40.4 CM = WBL LOS = C Delay = 18.1 CM = Critical Movement * = Delay is Excessive, software does not attempt to present a value West Plains Development – Spokane Tribe Page | 10 Traffic Impact Analysis April 28, 2011
INTERSECTION Hwy. 2 / Craig Rd. Hwy. 2 / Lundstrom St. Hwy. 2 / Lawson St. Hwy. 2 / Garfield St. Hwy. 2 / Hayford Rd. Craig Rd. / Deno Rd. Craig Rd. / McFarlane St. Craig Rd. / Thorpe Rd. East Craig Rd. / Thorpe Rd. West Craig Rd. / SR 902 Hwy. 2 / Fairchild AFB. Craig Rd. / 6 th Ave. Hwy. 2 / Dwy. West Hwy. 2 / Dwy. Middle Hwy. 2 / Dwy. East Craig Rd. / Dwy. North Craig Rd. / Dwy. Middle Craig Rd. / Dwy. South Table ES- 3. Operational Analysis Summary-Alternative 1 2012 PM Peak Pipeline CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = 75.0 CM = NBLTR LOS = C Delay = 23.7 LOS = B Delay = 18.9 LOS = B Delay = 16.9 LOS = D Delay = 41.4 CM = EBLTR LOS = A Delay = 9.4 CM = WBLTR LOS = B Delay = 10.8 CM = SBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = NBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = SBLTR LOS = D Delay = 34.5 LOS = B Delay = 15.8 CM = WBL LOS = B Delay = 10.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2012 PM Peak BG + Alt1-Ph1 CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = * CM = NBLTR LOS = E Delay = 46.3 LOS = B Delay = 18.8 LOS = B Delay = 19.3 LOS = E Delay = 59.8 CM = WBLTR LOS = B Delay = 10.7 CM = WBLTR LOS = C Delay = 15.7 CM = SBLR LOS = B Delay = 11.3 CM = NBLR LOS = B Delay = 10.1 CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = 421.4 LOS = B Delay = 19.0 CM = WBL LOS = B Delay = 12.0 CM = SBR LOS = C Delay = 16.1 CM = SBL LOS = F Delay = * CM = SBR LOS = C Delay = 16.4 CM = EBL LOS = B Delay = 12.8 CM = EBL LOS = B Delay = 11.9 CM = EBL LOS = B Delay = 14.9 2015 PM Peak Pipeline CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = 806.7 CM = NBLTR LOS = D Delay = 28.7 LOS = B Delay = 20.1 LOS = C Delay = 21.9 LOS = D Delay = 44.5 CM = EBLTR LOS = A Delay = 9.4 CM = WBLTR LOS = B Delay = 10.9 CM = SBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = NBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = SBLTR LOS = E Delay = 36.4 LOS = B Delay = 17.4 CM = WBL LOS = B Delay = 11.6 CM = Critical Movement * = Delay is Excessive, software does not attempt to present a value -- -- -- -- -- -- 2015 PM Peak BG + Alt1-Ph2 CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = * CM = NBLTR LOS = F Delay = 76.6 LOS = C Delay = 22.8 LOS = C Delay = 27.9 LOS = E Delay = 80.0 CM = WBLTR LOS = B Delay = 11.2 CM = WBLTR LOS = C Delay = 18.0 CM = SBLR LOS = B Delay = 12.5 CM = NBLR LOS = B Delay = 10.5 CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = 671.9 LOS = C Delay = 22.1 CM = WBL LOS = B Delay = 15.0 CM = SBR LOS = C Delay = 18.9 CM = SBL LOS = F Delay = * CM = SBR LOS = C Delay = 19.6 CM = EBL LOS = C Delay = 16.3 CM = EBL LOS = B Delay = 14.0 CM = EBL LOS = C Delay = 20.2 2019 PM Peak Pipeline CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = * CM = NBLTR LOS = E Delay = 42.8 LOS = C Delay = 23.1 LOS = C Delay = 29.6 LOS = E Delay = 66.6 CM = EBLTR LOS = A Delay = 9.4 CM = WBLTR LOS = B Delay = 10.9 CM = SBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.1 CM = NBLR LOS = A Delay = 9.0 CM = SBLTR LOS = E Delay = 37.8 LOS = C Delay = 21.4 CM = WBL LOS = C Delay = 24.3 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2019 PM Peak BG + Alt1-Ph3 CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = * CM = NBLTR LOS = F Delay = 217.2 LOS = D Delay = 39.4 LOS = E Delay = 69.2 LOS = F Delay = 140.9 CM = WBLTR LOS = B Delay = 11.7 CM = WBLTR LOS = C Delay = 20.5 CM = SBLR LOS = B Delay = 13.9 CM = NBLR LOS = B Delay = 10.9 CM = SBLTR LOS = F Delay = * LOS = C Delay = 31.9 CM = WBL LOS = E Delay = 44.0 CM = SBR LOS = D Delay = 25.8 CM = SBL LOS = F Delay = * CM = SBR LOS = D Delay = 25.8 CM = EBL LOS = E Delay = 47.4 CM = EBL LOS = C Delay = 22.3 CM = EBL LOS = E Delay = 48.6 West Plains Development – Spokane Tribe Page | 11 Traffic Impact Analysis April 28, 2011
Page 1 and 2: APPENDIX D TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Page 4 and 5: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMM
Page 6 and 7: Table 7. Alternative 1 - PM Peak Ho
Page 8 and 9: • 10,480-square-foot Tribal Cultu
Page 10 and 11: Hwy. 2 / Hayford Rd. S 2012 - Phase
Page 12 and 13: Hwy 2 / Lundstrom: Restripe and wid
Page 14 and 15: 2032 Alternative 2 Mitigations (in
Page 18 and 19: Table ES- 4. Operational Analysis S
Page 20 and 21: INTERSECTION MITIGATION - ALTERNATI
Page 22 and 23: MITIGATION-ALT 2, CONTINUED 2012 PM
Page 24 and 25: MITIGATION-ALT 3, CONTINUED INTERSE
Page 26 and 27: • 41,633-square-foot commercial d
Page 28 and 29: Project Site J 908 N. Howard St. St
Page 30 and 31: J Map from Friedmutter Group, Decem
Page 32 and 33: 2.5 Methodology The weekday PM peak
Page 34 and 35: 2.7 Applicable Standards, Policies
Page 36 and 37: 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Street N
Page 39: 3.5 Traffic Volumes The bulk of int
Page 42: Pipeline Project Description and As
Page 46: 4.4 Operational Analysis and Level
Page 50 and 51: 5. TRIP GENERATION and DISTRIBUTION
Page 52 and 53: 5.3 Trip Generation - Alternative 2
Page 54 and 55: 5.6 Trip Reductions and Net New Tri
Page 56: 5.7 Trip Distribution (Proposed Pro
Page 65: 6.1.2 ALTERNATIVE 1 - 2015 Phase 2
Page 69 and 70:
6.1.4 ALTERNATIVE 1 - MITIGATION Th
Page 71 and 72:
Listed below are improvements recom
Page 73:
6.1.5 ALTERNATIVE 2 - 2012 Buildout
Page 76 and 77:
MITIGATION-ALT 2, CONTINUED 2012 PM
Page 79 and 80:
6.1.8 ALTERNATIVE 3 - MITIGATION Th
Page 81 and 82:
The Spokane Tribe should work with
Page 87 and 88:
Table 22. Level of Service for 2032
Page 89 and 90:
Alternative 3 is projected to gener
Page 91 and 92:
2032 Alternative 2 Mitigations:
Page 93 and 94:
8. CONCLUSIONS Based upon the techn
Page 95 and 96:
9. RECOMMENDATIONS Mitigation recom
Page 97 and 98:
Hwy 2 / Hayford: Optimize signal ti
Page 99:
Hwy 2 / Fairchild AFB: Modify signa
Page 102 and 103:
APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA Appen
Page 104 and 105:
PROJECT: West Plains Development DA
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
1 PROJECT: DAVID EVANS and ASSOCIAT
Page 114 and 115:
PROJECT: Project Location INTERSECT
Page 116 and 117:
Pipeline (Year 2012) Int. # INTERSE
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
APPENDIX C TRIP GENERATION/INTERNAL
Page 124 and 125:
TRIP GENERATION LAND USE: SHOPPING
Page 126 and 127:
TRIP GENERATION LAND USE: Quality S
Page 128 and 129:
TRIP GENERATION LAND USE: POLICE ST
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
ITE Multi-Use Project Internal Capt
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 156 and 157:
APPENDIX E SYNCHRO WORKSHEETS Appen
Page 158 and 159:
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capac
Page 160 and 161:
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacit
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
APPENDIX E4 YEAR 2019 EXISTING PLUS
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
APPENDIX E6 ALTERNATIVE 1 YEAR 2015
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
YEAR 2032 SYNCHRO WORKSHEETS Append
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425:
APPENDIX F SIDRA ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Page 428 and 429:
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Craig Rd./Hwy. (YE
Page 430 and 431:
INTERSECTION SUMMARY Craig Rd./Hwy.
Page 432 and 433:
QUEUE DISTANCE Largest 95% Back of
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 438 and 439:
Page 440 and 441:
Page 443 and 444:
INTERSECTION SUMMARY Middle Dwy./Hw
Page 445 and 446:
Page 447 and 448:
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Middle Dwy./Hwy. (
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
Page 453 and 454:
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457:
Page 460 and 461:
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Craig Rd./Hwy. 902
Page 462 and 463:
Page 464 and 465:
Page 466 and 467:
Page 468 and 469:
Page 470 and 471:
Page 472 and 473:
Page 474 and 475:
YEAR 2032 SIDRA ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
Page 476 and 477:
Page 478 and 479:
Page 480 and 481:
Page 482 and 483:
Page 484 and 485:
Page 486 and 487:
Page 488 and 489:
Page 490 and 491:
Page 492 and 493:
Page 494 and 495:
Page 496 and 497:
Page 498 and 499:
Page 500 and 501:
Page 502 and 503:
Page 504 and 505:
Page 506 and 507:
Page 508 and 509:
Page 510:
Page 513 and 514:
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Craig Rd./6th Ave.
Page 516 and 517:
MOVEMENT SUMMARY Craig Rd./Dwy. Nor
Page 518 and 519:
Page 520 and 521:
8 Hour-100%-Minimum Volume - Craig-
Page 522 and 523:
8 Hour-100%-Minimum Volume - Craig-
Page 524 and 525:
8 Hour-100%-Minimum Volume - Middle
Page 526 and 527:
8 Hour-100%-Minimum Volume - Middle
Page 528 and 529:
8 Hour-100%-Minimum Volume - SR-902
Page 530 and 531:
8 Hour-100%-Minimum Volume - SR-902
Page 532:
ADDENDUM TO TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Page 535 and 536:
overall site plan would not be sign
Page 537 and 538:
In lieu of the various mitigations
Page 539 and 540:
Project Proportional Share: 29.8% F
Page 541 and 542:
Hwy 2 / Fairchild AFB: Modify signa
Page 544 and 545:
Attachment B: Two Roundabout Access
Page 546 and 547:
Attachment C: Operational Analysis
Page 548 and 549:
Page 550:
Page 553 and 554:
LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY West Dwy./
Page 556 and 557:
MOVEMENT SUMMARY West Dwy./Hwy. (YE
Page 558:
Page 561 and 562:
Page 564 and 565:
MOVEMENT SUMMARY West Dwy./Hwy. (YE
Page 566:
Page 569 and 570:
Page 572 and 573:
MOVEMENT SUMMARY West RB 2032 Alt.1
Page 574:
Page 577 and 578:
LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY West RB 20
Page 580 and 581:
MOVEMENT SUMMARY West RB 2032 Alt.3
Page 582:
Page 585 and 586:
LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Middle Dwy
Page 588 and 589:
Page 590:
Page 593 and 594:
Page 596 and 597:
Page 598:
Page 601 and 602:
Page 604 and 605:
Page 606:
Page 609 and 610:
Page 612 and 613:
Page 614:
Page 617 and 618:
LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Craig Rd./
show all

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?