21.01.2015 Views

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.5 Operational <strong>Analysis</strong> and Level of Service - 2019 Pipeline Conditions<br />

The Year 2019 pipeline traffic volumes used for this analysis scenario are shown in Figure 8.<br />

Operational analysis results are summarized in the table below.<br />

INTERSECTION<br />

Table 6. Level of Service for Year 2019 Pipeline PM Peak Hour Conditions<br />

(S)ignalized<br />

(U)nsignalized<br />

Critical<br />

Movement By<br />

Approach<br />

Peak hour Level of Service (LOS)<br />

PM Peak Hour<br />

Delay<br />

Hwy. 2 at Craig Rd. U SB LTR * F<br />

Hwy. 2 at Lundstrom St. U NB LTR 42.8 E<br />

Hwy. 2 at Lawson St. S -- 23.1 C<br />

Hwy. 2 at Garfield St. S -- 29.6 C<br />

Hwy. 2 at Hayford Rd. S -- 66.6 E<br />

Craig Rd. at Deno Rd. U EB LTR 9.4 A<br />

Craig Rd. at McFarlane St. U WB LTR 10.9 B<br />

Craig Rd. at Thorpe Rd. East U SB LR 9.1 A<br />

Craig Rd. at Thorpe Rd. West U NB LR 9.0 A<br />

Craig Rd. at SR 902 U SB LTR 37.8 E<br />

Hwy. 2 at Fairchild AFB S -- 21.4 C<br />

Craig Rd. / 6 th Ave. U WB Lt. 24.3 C<br />

* Excessive Delay<br />

As shown in Table 6, the Hwy 2/Craig Rd. and Hwy 2/Hayford Rd. intersections are expected to have<br />

failing LOS’s of F and E respectively under 2019 Background conditions.<br />

LOS<br />

West Plains Development – Spokane Tribe Page | 42<br />

<strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> April 28, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!