21.01.2015 Views

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

Appendix D Traffic Impact Analysis - westplainseis.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.5 Methodology<br />

The weekday PM peak hour has been identified as the time period when the greatest traffic demands are<br />

placed on the transportation system. This will be the time period utilized by this study for analyzing the<br />

traffic impacts of the proposed project. Mitigation needs, if any will generally arise during the peak<br />

hours. By inspection, if the system operates acceptably under PM peak hour traffic conditions, it will<br />

operate better as lower traffic volumes are observed during other times of the day.<br />

The impact due to the proposed project was measured by <strong>com</strong>paring the level of service of the existing,<br />

future without project and future with project scenarios. The Without Project scenarios include the<br />

existing traffic conditions and Year 2012, 2015 and 2019 conditions. Background traffic volumes were<br />

derived from inclusion of approved, unbuilt pipeline projects. Refer to the future conditions sections of<br />

this document for additional discussion of the pipeline projects. Trip generation for most elements of the<br />

proposed project were calculated using the data provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers'<br />

(ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition manual. Trip generation for the Casino/Hotel <strong>com</strong>ponent is<br />

based on information provided in Recalibration of Trip Generation Model for Las Vegas Hotel/Casinos.<br />

May, 2002 ITE Journal pp. 26-33. Rowe, Kaseko, Ackeret. Trip generation for the proposed police/fire<br />

facility was based on data from Police Station PM Peak Hour Trip Generation in the Portland Metro<br />

Area, December 2, 2009, Portland State University, Armans, Edmonds, et al.<br />

The LOS evaluation for this study was conducted using Synchro 7.0 developed by <strong>Traffic</strong>ware. The<br />

software is primarily based on the procedures outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway<br />

Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000. This software uses detailed information on geometry, lane use, signal<br />

timing, peak hour volumes, and vehicle arrival types. The information is then used to calculate delays<br />

and to determine the LOS for each movement/approach. LOS was calculated for each study intersection<br />

under the three analysis scenarios. SIDRA software was used for roundabout analysis as is the standard<br />

practice in the state of Washington. Detailed Synchro analysis output worksheets are included in<br />

<strong>Appendix</strong> C of this report, while SIDRA analysis output is included in <strong>Appendix</strong> F.<br />

2.6 Level of Service<br />

Level of service (LOS) is a qualifiable premise developed by the transportation profession to quantify<br />

driver perception for such elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and<br />

impediments caused by other vehicles afforded to drivers who utilize the transportation network. It has<br />

been defined by the Transportation Research Board in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. This<br />

document has quantified level of service into a range from “A” which indicates little, if any, vehicle<br />

delay, to “F” which indicates significant vehicle delay and traffic congestion which may lead to system<br />

breakdown due to traffic volumes which may exceed capacity.<br />

2.6.1 Signalized Intersections<br />

For signalized intersections, recent research has determined that average control delay per vehicle is the<br />

best available measure of level of service. Control delay can be defined as the difference between the<br />

actual travel time and the free-speed travel time. Control delay includes the initial deceleration of vehicle<br />

from free-speed (posted speed limit) to join the queue, time spent in the queue and the acceleration from<br />

stop bar to the free-speed. HCM methodology estimates the average control delay for each lane group<br />

and aggregated for each approach and intersection as a whole.<br />

2.6.2 Unsignalized Intersections<br />

For unsignalized intersections, level of service is based on the delay experienced by each movement<br />

within the intersection. In the case of a two-way stop controlled intersection, the delay experienced by<br />

the minor street approach movements and the major street left turn movements are considered as the<br />

performance measure. Vehicles passing straight through the intersection on the major (uncontrolled)<br />

street experience no delay at the two-way stop controlled intersection. On the other hand, vehicles which<br />

are turning left from the minor street must stop for all left turning vehicle from the major street and all<br />

West Plains Development – Spokane Tribe Page | 26<br />

<strong>Traffic</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> April 28, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!