27.02.2018 Views

HRM textbook

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 2 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND THE LAW 51<br />

under Title VII. Courts have also rejected arguments that prohibiting cornrow<br />

hair styles infringed on black employees expression of cultural identification.<br />

* Uniforms. When it comes to discriminatory uniforms and/or suggestive attire,<br />

however, courts frequently side with employees. For example, requiring female<br />

employees (such as waitresses) to wear sexually suggestive attire as a condition of<br />

employment has been ruled as violating Title VII in many cases. 90<br />

* Tattoos and body piercings. Tattoos and body piercings are an issue at work. For<br />

example, about 38% of millennials in one survey had tattoos as compared with<br />

15% of baby boomers. About 23% of millennials had body piercings as compared<br />

with 1% of baby boomers. One case involved a waiter with religious tattoos on his<br />

wrists at a Red Robin Gourmet Burgers store. The company insisted he cover his<br />

tattoos at work; he refused. Red Robin subsequently settled a lawsuit after the<br />

waiter claimed that covering the tattoos would be a sin based on his religion. 91<br />

What the Supervisor Should Keep in Mind<br />

The human resource manager plays a big role in helping the company avoid<br />

practices like these, but at the end of the day, the first-line supervisor usually<br />

triggers the problem. You make an ill-informed or foolish comment, and the<br />

employee is quick to sue. Even something apparently nondiscriminatory like<br />

telling a female candidate you d be concerned about her safety on the job after<br />

dark might trigger a claim.<br />

This is therefore a good point at which to emphasize three things. First, carefully<br />

learning this chapter s contents is important. For example, understand the<br />

questions you can and cannot ask when interviewing applicants, and know what<br />

constitutes sexual harassment. There is no substitute for that knowledge. Good<br />

intentions are no excuse.<br />

Second, the courts may hold you (not just your employer) personally liable for<br />

your injudicious actions. Management malpractice is aberrant conduct on the part<br />

of the manager that has serious consequences for the employee s personal or physical<br />

well-being, or which, as one court put it, exceeds all bounds usually tolerated by<br />

society. 92 In one outrageous example, the employer demoted a manager to janitor<br />

and took other steps to humiliate the person. The jury subsequently awarded the<br />

former manager $3.4 million. Supervisors who commit management malpractice<br />

may be personally liable for paying a portion of the judgment.<br />

Third, know that retaliation is illegal under equal rights laws. To paraphrase the<br />

EEOC, all of the laws we enforce make it illegal to fire, demote, harass, or otherwise<br />

retaliate against people because they filed a charge, complained to their employer or<br />

other covered entity about discrimination, or because they participated in a<br />

discrimination investigation or lawsuit . 93 In one U.S. Supreme Court case, the<br />

employee complained to a government agency that her employer paid her less than<br />

male counterparts. Soon after the company heard about the complaint, it fired her<br />

fiancé, who also worked for the firm. Finding for the employee, the U.S. Supreme<br />

Court decision said, a reasonable worker might be dissuaded from engaging in<br />

protected activity if she knew that her fiancé would be fired. 94<br />

6 List the steps in the EEOC<br />

enforcement process.<br />

THE EEOC ENFORCEMENT PROCESS<br />

Even prudent employers eventually face employment discrimination claims and have to<br />

deal with EEOC officials. All managers (not just human resource managers) play roles<br />

in this process. Figure 2-3 provides an overview of the process. 95<br />

* File Charge. The process begins when someone files a claim with the EEOC.<br />

Either the aggrieved person or a member of the EEOC who has reasonable cause<br />

to believe that a violation occurred must file the claim in writing and under<br />

oath. 96 Under CRA 1991, the discrimination claim must be filed within 300 days<br />

(when there is a similar state law) or 180 days (where there is no similar state law)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!