Punjab Police Rules Volume 1 - Sangrur Police
Punjab Police Rules Volume 1 - Sangrur Police
Punjab Police Rules Volume 1 - Sangrur Police
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Pensions 147<br />
lar habits, or whether it is due to one act which, from neglect, may have resulted in ruining<br />
his constitution and health. The mere fact that a police officer has suffered from syphilis<br />
is not sufficient to make him liable to the forfeiture or reduction of pension. Such cases<br />
will be decided on consideration of their history as a whole. The record in such cases shall<br />
be submitted to the Deputy Inspector-General for orders, with the other documents of the<br />
case.<br />
Rule 9.13<br />
9.13. Invaliding Boards. - If the pension applied for exceeds Rs. 100 a month a certificate<br />
by a single medical officer should not be accepted as sufficient. In such a case the<br />
applicant shall be produced before the standing medical board or an invaliding committee<br />
(vide Chapter VIII of <strong>Punjab</strong> Medical Manual) with the following documents :-<br />
(i) The invaliding roll signed by the Civil Surgeon or competent medical officer, (ii)<br />
The nominal roll (Form No. 9.13), the character roll and (iii) the medical history<br />
of officer.<br />
Rule 9.14<br />
9.14. Retention in service after date of invalidment. - Ordinarily a police officer<br />
shall not be retained in service after the date of his being certified unfit for service, and,<br />
except with the special order of the authority competent to grant the pension, service after<br />
that date shall not count for pension (For exemption to this rule see Article 456, Civil<br />
Service Regulations). When an invaliding roll is signed by more than one medical officer,<br />
and on different dates, the date of invaliding shall be taken to be the last of such dates.<br />
Rule 9.15<br />
9.15. Superannuation pension. - (1) A superannuation pension is granted to an officer<br />
in superior service entitled or compelled by rule to retire at a particular age (Article<br />
458, Civil Service Regulations).<br />
(2) A ministerial officer may be required to retire at the age of 55 years, but should ordinarily<br />
be retained in service, if he continues efficient up to the age of 60 years, - vide rule<br />
56(b), <strong>Punjab</strong> Financial Handbook No. 2, <strong>Volume</strong> I. In the application of this rule the test<br />
of efficiency should be applied with reference to the requirements of the post the ministerial<br />
officer is holding. In the case of higher ministerial posts, the duties of which involve<br />
responsibility and the supervision of other clerks, the competent authority should not<br />
agree to retention in service beyond the age of 55 years, unless he is satisfied that the ministerial<br />
officer is fully able to discharge the responsibilities of the post and efficiently to<br />
carry out the supervision of his subordinates. Similarly, a lower ministerial officer shall<br />
not be retained in service beyond the age of 55 years unless he fulfills efficiently the requirements<br />
of the appointment held by him.<br />
(3) Officers other than ministerial, who have attained the age of 55 should ordinarily<br />
be required to retire and should not be retained in service except where unquestionable<br />
public grounds for retention exist, and there is not doubt as to the physical fitness of the<br />
officer. Extensions may not be granted for any period exceeding one year at a time.<br />
Rule 9.16<br />
9.16. Retention in service of Government servant after the age of 55 years - Under<br />
serial No. 23-A of rule 22.4 of the <strong>Punjab</strong> Financial Handbook No. 2, <strong>Volume</strong> II, Subsidiary<br />
<strong>Rules</strong>; powers are delegated to Heads of Departments to retain a non-gazetted<br />
Government servant, other than a ministerial servant, in the service, after the age of 55<br />
years, that any such retention of a Government servant must be on public grounds and that<br />
reasons must be recorded in writing. It follows that only in very exceptional circumstances<br />
can this power be exercised. The convenience or the financial advantage of the<br />
officer to be retained must in no circumstances be taken into consideration. The sole justification<br />
for exercising the power delegated, under the rule in question, is the interest of<br />
the public service. The question, in fact, is not whether it will benefit an officer to retain<br />
him, but whether the interests of the department will suffer if the officer is not retained.