20.06.2013 Views

Contratto ImpresaEuropa - Cedam

Contratto ImpresaEuropa - Cedam

Contratto ImpresaEuropa - Cedam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1008 CONTRATTO E IMPRESA / EUROPA<br />

price-fixing cartel led by Telmex, Mexico’s major telecommunication company.<br />

The Panel began its assessment from the definition of « major supplier<br />

». It noted that Mexico’s Reference Paper defines anti-competitive practices<br />

as those enacted by « suppliers who, alone or together are a major<br />

supplier ». The Panel observed that Telmex is both alone and together with<br />

other operators a major supplier. Firstly, it is a ‘major supplier’ for its own<br />

ability to affect the terms of participation through the use of its position in<br />

the market. Secondly, as the practices at issue involved also acts of other<br />

Mexican gateway operators, Telmex was a major supplier together with<br />

these latter suppliers.<br />

The Panel’s following step was to examine the meaning of the term of<br />

« anti-competitive practices ». Due to lack of any definition in the Reference<br />

Paper, the Panel looked at the ordinary meaning of the terms “practice”,<br />

“competition” and “competitive.” In line with the definition of these<br />

terms, the Panel interpreted the word “anti-competitive” as « tending to<br />

reduce or discourage competition ». On its own, therefore, the term « anti-competitive<br />

practices » is broad in scope, suggesting actions that<br />

« lessen rivalry or competition in the market ».<br />

As a next step the Panel looked at the meaning of the « anti-competitive<br />

practices » in the context of a Reference Paper. Section 1, paragraph 2<br />

states that these practices «shall include in particular » and further it provides<br />

examples of «anti-competitive practices ». Thus, the Panel concluded<br />

that this list is not exhaustive. The Panel also took the view that the notion<br />

of anti-competitive practices must be read in the light of other legal<br />

instruments, such as national competition laws and the United Nations Set<br />

of Multilaterally Agreed Equitable Principles and Rules for the Control of Restrictive<br />

Business Practices ( 26 ). Moreover, to the extent that both Mexico<br />

and the United States are Members of the Organisation for the Economic<br />

Development and Co-operation (hereinafter, « the OECD »), the definition<br />

of anti-competitive practices must include as well those practices –<br />

notably price fixing cartels and market-sharing agreements – that are already<br />

prohibited by the OECD Council Recommendation Concerning Effective<br />

Action against Hard Core Cartels ( 27 ). Such interpretation led the Pan-<br />

( 26 ) The United Nations Set of Multilaterally Agreed Equitable Principles and Rules for the<br />

Control of Restrictive Business Practices is available at the following website: http://r0.unctad.org/en/subsites/cpolicy/docs/CPSet/rbpc10rev20en.pdf.<br />

( 27 ) The OECD Council Recommendation Concerning Effective Action against Hard Core<br />

Cartels is available at the OECD website under the following link: http://www.oecd.org/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!