Climate Change and the European Water Dimension - Agri ...
Climate Change and the European Water Dimension - Agri ...
Climate Change and the European Water Dimension - Agri ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter V .C. <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong>, Ecological Status <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Water</strong> Framework Directive<br />
V.C.1. Introduction<br />
The <strong>Water</strong> Framework Directive (2000/60/EC; WFD) creates a legislative framework<br />
to manage, use, protect, <strong>and</strong> restore surface water <strong>and</strong> groundwater resources in <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>European</strong> Union. The WFD approaches water management at <strong>the</strong> scale of major<br />
river catchments (river basins), which in many cases include several countries. The<br />
WFD requires <strong>the</strong> establisment of a ‘river basin management plan’ (RBMP) for each<br />
of <strong>the</strong> river basins. The RBMP is a detailed account of how <strong>the</strong> environmental<br />
objectives (i.e. good ecological status of natural water bodies <strong>and</strong> good ecological<br />
potential of heavily modified <strong>and</strong> artificial water bodies) are to be achieved by 2015.<br />
For those countries that can demonstrate that this is not feasible without<br />
disproportionate economic <strong>and</strong> social costs, <strong>the</strong> Directive allows <strong>the</strong> possibility for a<br />
delay until 2030. This sets a time scale for restoration of <strong>the</strong> water bodies during<br />
which a considerable change in climate can be expected. Although it is stated that<br />
“… this Directive should provide mechanisms to address obstacles to progress in<br />
improving water status when <strong>the</strong>se fall outside <strong>the</strong> scope of Community water<br />
legislation, with a view to developing appropriate Community strategies for<br />
overcoming <strong>the</strong>m” (WFD, Article 47), climate change <strong>and</strong> its possible impact on water<br />
bodies has been left out of <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> WFD; <strong>the</strong> term “climate” does not appear<br />
in <strong>the</strong> text of <strong>the</strong> Directive.<br />
The WFD defines ecological status as “… an expression of <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong><br />
structure <strong>and</strong> functioning of aquatic ecosystems associated with surface waters …”.<br />
(WFD, Article 2: 21). The assessment of <strong>the</strong> ecological status in <strong>the</strong> WFD requires<br />
classification of water bodies in five quality classes using a Ecological Quality Ratio<br />
(EQR), which is a ratio between reference conditions <strong>and</strong> measured status of <strong>the</strong><br />
biological quality elements. Reference conditions should equal almost natural<br />
conditions. As shown elsewhere in this report, <strong>the</strong> anticipated effects of <strong>the</strong> climate<br />
change will affect most of <strong>the</strong> physical, chemical <strong>and</strong> biological parameters of water<br />
bodies used for ecological quality assessment. Although in some cases, climate<br />
change may bring a relief to environmental problems <strong>and</strong> help to achieve <strong>the</strong><br />
restoration goals set by <strong>the</strong> Directive (e.g. in areas with a prospected increase in<br />
precipitation), often pressures to aquatic ecosystems will increase as a result of<br />
climate change. As a consequence, <strong>the</strong>se effects cannot be mitigated in <strong>the</strong> context<br />
of <strong>the</strong> river basin management plan.<br />
In this chapter we discuss <strong>the</strong> conceptual impacts of <strong>the</strong> climate change on <strong>the</strong><br />
process <strong>and</strong> requirements of <strong>the</strong> ecological status assessment in <strong>the</strong> WFD. Using<br />
some examples we consider <strong>the</strong> various steps in <strong>the</strong> classification <strong>and</strong> assessment<br />
where <strong>the</strong> CC effects should be considered. We argue that reference conditions<br />
cannot be considered as static but will change as a consequence of climate change<br />
impacts on physical <strong>and</strong> chemical conditions of water bodies. The review of <strong>the</strong> river<br />
basin characterization every 6 years, as required by <strong>the</strong> WFD, will also include reevaluation<br />
of reference conditions. As a consequence <strong>the</strong> restoration targets (i.e. <strong>the</strong><br />
good ecological status) will also need to be evaluated periodically.<br />
137