24.08.2013 Views

Climate Change and the European Water Dimension - Agri ...

Climate Change and the European Water Dimension - Agri ...

Climate Change and the European Water Dimension - Agri ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter V .C. <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong>, Ecological Status <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Water</strong> Framework Directive<br />

V.C.1. Introduction<br />

The <strong>Water</strong> Framework Directive (2000/60/EC; WFD) creates a legislative framework<br />

to manage, use, protect, <strong>and</strong> restore surface water <strong>and</strong> groundwater resources in <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>European</strong> Union. The WFD approaches water management at <strong>the</strong> scale of major<br />

river catchments (river basins), which in many cases include several countries. The<br />

WFD requires <strong>the</strong> establisment of a ‘river basin management plan’ (RBMP) for each<br />

of <strong>the</strong> river basins. The RBMP is a detailed account of how <strong>the</strong> environmental<br />

objectives (i.e. good ecological status of natural water bodies <strong>and</strong> good ecological<br />

potential of heavily modified <strong>and</strong> artificial water bodies) are to be achieved by 2015.<br />

For those countries that can demonstrate that this is not feasible without<br />

disproportionate economic <strong>and</strong> social costs, <strong>the</strong> Directive allows <strong>the</strong> possibility for a<br />

delay until 2030. This sets a time scale for restoration of <strong>the</strong> water bodies during<br />

which a considerable change in climate can be expected. Although it is stated that<br />

“… this Directive should provide mechanisms to address obstacles to progress in<br />

improving water status when <strong>the</strong>se fall outside <strong>the</strong> scope of Community water<br />

legislation, with a view to developing appropriate Community strategies for<br />

overcoming <strong>the</strong>m” (WFD, Article 47), climate change <strong>and</strong> its possible impact on water<br />

bodies has been left out of <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> WFD; <strong>the</strong> term “climate” does not appear<br />

in <strong>the</strong> text of <strong>the</strong> Directive.<br />

The WFD defines ecological status as “… an expression of <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong><br />

structure <strong>and</strong> functioning of aquatic ecosystems associated with surface waters …”.<br />

(WFD, Article 2: 21). The assessment of <strong>the</strong> ecological status in <strong>the</strong> WFD requires<br />

classification of water bodies in five quality classes using a Ecological Quality Ratio<br />

(EQR), which is a ratio between reference conditions <strong>and</strong> measured status of <strong>the</strong><br />

biological quality elements. Reference conditions should equal almost natural<br />

conditions. As shown elsewhere in this report, <strong>the</strong> anticipated effects of <strong>the</strong> climate<br />

change will affect most of <strong>the</strong> physical, chemical <strong>and</strong> biological parameters of water<br />

bodies used for ecological quality assessment. Although in some cases, climate<br />

change may bring a relief to environmental problems <strong>and</strong> help to achieve <strong>the</strong><br />

restoration goals set by <strong>the</strong> Directive (e.g. in areas with a prospected increase in<br />

precipitation), often pressures to aquatic ecosystems will increase as a result of<br />

climate change. As a consequence, <strong>the</strong>se effects cannot be mitigated in <strong>the</strong> context<br />

of <strong>the</strong> river basin management plan.<br />

In this chapter we discuss <strong>the</strong> conceptual impacts of <strong>the</strong> climate change on <strong>the</strong><br />

process <strong>and</strong> requirements of <strong>the</strong> ecological status assessment in <strong>the</strong> WFD. Using<br />

some examples we consider <strong>the</strong> various steps in <strong>the</strong> classification <strong>and</strong> assessment<br />

where <strong>the</strong> CC effects should be considered. We argue that reference conditions<br />

cannot be considered as static but will change as a consequence of climate change<br />

impacts on physical <strong>and</strong> chemical conditions of water bodies. The review of <strong>the</strong> river<br />

basin characterization every 6 years, as required by <strong>the</strong> WFD, will also include reevaluation<br />

of reference conditions. As a consequence <strong>the</strong> restoration targets (i.e. <strong>the</strong><br />

good ecological status) will also need to be evaluated periodically.<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!