24.08.2013 Views

Climate Change and the European Water Dimension - Agri ...

Climate Change and the European Water Dimension - Agri ...

Climate Change and the European Water Dimension - Agri ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>and</strong> possibly elimination of seasonal migrants to shallow, ice-covered winterkill lakes.<br />

In temperate region, on <strong>the</strong> contrary, <strong>the</strong> risk of winter fish-kills is smaller in warmer<br />

winters. In response to higher temperatures, nor<strong>the</strong>rn boreal populations of cyprinid<br />

<strong>and</strong> percid fish species are expected to increase at <strong>the</strong> expense of coldwater,<br />

salmonid species (Lehtonen, 1996). Shallow lakes would be most susceptible to<br />

<strong>the</strong>se changes because of <strong>the</strong>ir lack of <strong>the</strong>rmal stratification. Total freshwater fish<br />

production is expected to increase, but with <strong>the</strong> projected changes in <strong>the</strong> composition<br />

of fish fauna, <strong>the</strong> recreational <strong>and</strong> commercial value of catches will decrease<br />

(Lehtonen, 1996).<br />

IV.B.10. Ecosystem response of lakes<br />

In conclusion, different species as well as physical <strong>and</strong> chemical properties react<br />

differently because of <strong>the</strong>ir different interactions in <strong>the</strong> foodweb. However, some<br />

changes might be relevant on a species level, but all <strong>the</strong>se single effects may weigh<br />

differently in <strong>the</strong> lake ecosystem as a whole. Petchy et al. (1999) conducted<br />

microcosm experiments to control species composition <strong>and</strong> rates of environmental<br />

change. They suggested that ecosystem responses are not as clear as studies of<br />

single trophic levels indicate. Complex responses generated in entire food webs<br />

greatly complicate inferences based on single functional groups. Here, <strong>the</strong><br />

consideration of more general ecological concepts is needed in order to underst<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> syn<strong>the</strong>size climatic effects on lake ecosystems. The strength of food web<br />

interactions is characterized by many weak <strong>and</strong> few strong interactions (McCann et<br />

al., 1998). Weak links in particular act to dampen oscillations between consumers<br />

<strong>and</strong> resources (McCann et al., 1998) <strong>and</strong> presumably also environmental stressors,<br />

as climate extremes. This means that not all responses at a specific trophic level are<br />

propagated to lower trophic levels or have significant impacts on ecosystem<br />

processes (Pace et al., 1999). Additionally, a prolongation due to food web<br />

interactions is possible as <strong>the</strong> signal of winter climate can be detected in <strong>the</strong> clear<br />

water phase in early summer (Straile <strong>and</strong> Adrian, 2000) or in <strong>the</strong> summer<br />

phytoplankton composition <strong>and</strong> biomass (Weyhenmeyer, 2001; Blenckner et al.,<br />

2002). A system approach is necessary to examine <strong>the</strong> cascading effects in<br />

response to climatic change <strong>and</strong> variability. The magnitude of a climate-driven<br />

response of an autotrophic organism is not necessarily mediated or cascaded to <strong>the</strong><br />

heterotrophic species, or vice versa. The potential for misleading inferences has<br />

been highlighted (Harrington et al., 1999). Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> non-linearity in <strong>the</strong><br />

response to environmental variables (including climate) of animal <strong>and</strong> plants should<br />

be remembered (May, 1986; Mysterud et al., 2001), as smooth changes can be<br />

interrupted by drastic switches to a contrasting state of <strong>the</strong> ecosystem function<br />

(Scheffer et al., 2001).<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!