25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

thereof must have gone out of fashion. 107<br />

From the 1780s the descrip<strong>to</strong>r ‘staymaker’<br />

makes <strong>an</strong> appear<strong>an</strong>ce, followed by ‘habit-maker’ from the 1830s. 108<br />

After 1750 Tables 4.2 <strong>an</strong>d 4.4 both show <strong>an</strong> apparent decline in the percentage of<br />

the workforce working as tailors. Perhaps tailors became less numerous as they<br />

concentrated on a purely local market rather th<strong>an</strong> the more extensive market hinted at<br />

above. This possible reversal in the market may have caused a decline in wealth for<br />

tailors <strong>an</strong>d their consequent absence from probate records. 109<br />

Baptism records (in Table<br />

4.6) show that tailors were still plying their trade <strong>an</strong>d were indeed on the increase in<br />

Period D. 110<br />

In the latter period it was increasingly likely that tailors retailed items made<br />

elsewhere.<br />

Musson points out that most clothing was bespoke before 1700, but even at this<br />

early period some garments, especially hats, were s<strong>to</strong>cked ready-made. 111<br />

In addition <strong>to</strong><br />

the hatter cum feltmaker mentioned above, there was always enough call in the <strong>to</strong>wn for<br />

at least one hat-maker. From the probate of the hat-maker William Alex<strong>an</strong>der in 1767, it<br />

is clear that he was a cut above most of the tailors, with two houses <strong>an</strong>d l<strong>an</strong>d in the<br />

common field, mainly sub-let <strong>to</strong> others. 112<br />

Alex<strong>an</strong>der was followed in the hat trade by<br />

Thomas Osborn <strong>an</strong>d Joseph Wilks. 113<br />

107 The term bodicemaker was not found in <strong>an</strong>y parish apart from Alcester, where it occurred from 1676<br />

until 1729.<br />

108 For example, staymakers in WaRO, DR360/79/ 49 dating from 1780 <strong>an</strong>d UBD 1792. WaRO, Alcester<br />

1851 census lists a h<strong>an</strong>dful of female staymakers. Two male habitmakers cum tailors appear in Alcester’s<br />

apprenticeship records from 1830s. (For example, WaRO, DR360/79/291). ‘Habitmakers’ also appear in<br />

Redditch <strong>an</strong>d Bidford at this time.<br />

109 However, several tailors appear in other sources <strong>an</strong>d as witnesses in marriage bonds <strong>an</strong>d beneficiaries in<br />

probate.<br />

110 UBD 1792 lists 4 tailors <strong>an</strong>d Pigot 1835 lists 12.<br />

111 Musson, The Growth of British Industry, p. 49.<br />

112 WoRO, probate of William Alex<strong>an</strong>der, Alcester, hatmaker, 1767. His brother was also a hatmaker in<br />

Warwick.<br />

113 UBD 1792. The direc<strong>to</strong>ry does not reveal the type of hats being made.<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!