25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sources such as smaller population growth, demonstrate Alcester’s relative stagnation as<br />

a market <strong>to</strong>wn over the study period. This contrasts with Smith’s findings for the<br />

Nottinghamshire <strong>to</strong>wns in her study, whish, ‘irrespective of size, supported a<br />

considerably increased r<strong>an</strong>ge of trades <strong>an</strong>d services’ between 1680 <strong>an</strong>d 1840. 13<br />

Appendix 3 shows that the average (me<strong>an</strong>) value of male probate inven<strong>to</strong>ries in<br />

Alcester fluctuated over time, but were for the most part higher th<strong>an</strong> those of the<br />

surrounding countryside. 14<br />

If <strong>an</strong>y signific<strong>an</strong>ce is <strong>to</strong> be read in<strong>to</strong> these values, it suggests<br />

that Alcester may have prospered from 1680 until the early 1720s. 15<br />

However, in the<br />

period 1720-39, Alcester’s average inven<strong>to</strong>ry value fell dramatically <strong>an</strong>d became<br />

signific<strong>an</strong>tly smaller th<strong>an</strong> the value for the other zones. M<strong>an</strong>y of those leaving probate no<br />

doubt died prematurely in the epidemic circa 1730 before building up their personal<br />

wealth, but the <strong>to</strong>wn’s commercial activities would also have been adversely affected<br />

both by <strong>an</strong>y general slow-down in the economy <strong>an</strong>d by the hardships suffered by its<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mers from the <strong>to</strong>wn <strong>an</strong>d its hinterl<strong>an</strong>d during the epidemics circa 1730. Although<br />

the numbers of inven<strong>to</strong>ries after 1740 are small, they suggest that personal wealth in<br />

Alcester may have shown signs of recovery in mid-century.<br />

13 C. Smith, ‘Populations growth <strong>an</strong>d economic ch<strong>an</strong>ge in some Nottinghamshire market <strong>to</strong>wns, 1680-<br />

1840’, p. 39.<br />

14 Although PCC wills have been included in the study area’s probate statistics, accomp<strong>an</strong>ying probate<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ries do not survive, so potentially high value inven<strong>to</strong>ries are missing. Alcester’s (average) me<strong>an</strong><br />

values are higher th<strong>an</strong> for <strong>an</strong>y of the other zones in the study area at the time <strong>an</strong>d provide <strong>an</strong> interesting<br />

comparison with Stratford (average £153 from1660-79 <strong>an</strong>d £168 from 1680-99). Figures for Stratford<br />

mentioned here are taken from J. Jones, ed., ‘Stratford upon Avon inven<strong>to</strong>ries, 1538-1699, vol. 2, 1626-<br />

1699’, Dugdale Soc. Publications, 40, (2003), which lists 29 different occupations in Stratford’s probate<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ries from 1660-1699.<br />

15 Ripley, ‘Village <strong>an</strong>d <strong>to</strong>wn: occupations <strong>an</strong>d wealth in the hinterl<strong>an</strong>d of Gloucester, 1660-1700’, p.178,<br />

shows that me<strong>an</strong> personal wealth in probate in the city of Gloucester at this period was £244, in market<br />

<strong>to</strong>wns around Gloucester £154 <strong>an</strong>d in the countryside £137. By comparison, me<strong>an</strong> personal wealth in<br />

Alcester 1660-99 was £168 <strong>an</strong>d in the villages of the study area £111.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!