25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tables 5.2 <strong>an</strong>d 5.6 show the agricultural sec<strong>to</strong>r’s domin<strong>an</strong>ce but relative decline<br />

over the two centuries. 28<br />

Despite the vale’s reputation for corn-growing, probate<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ries indicate that mixed farming was the norm. 29<br />

The me<strong>an</strong> value of both<br />

yeomen’s <strong>an</strong>d husb<strong>an</strong>dmen’s inven<strong>to</strong>ries are by far the highest in the study area from<br />

1660-79, but fall well below the other sub-districts in the period 1680-99. 30 When corn<br />

prices fell, farmers further north (nearer the Birmingham market) could perhaps maintain<br />

higher prices <strong>an</strong>d were better placed <strong>to</strong> cater for the dem<strong>an</strong>d for meat <strong>an</strong>d hides. 31<br />

In the<br />

1720s <strong>an</strong>d 1730s at a time when Alcester’s tradesmen were feeling the pinch, the yeomen<br />

of the Champion Country enjoyed high inven<strong>to</strong>ry values. 32<br />

Around this time beef cattle<br />

were probably more in evidence here th<strong>an</strong> formerly. Grazier-gentlemen like the Phillips,<br />

Edden <strong>an</strong>d Zouch families grew fat along with their cattle on the lush Avonside pastures.<br />

Of the farmers who left probate in Period A 73 were described as yeomen <strong>an</strong>d 37<br />

as husb<strong>an</strong>dmen, with 5 labourers. Around 1700 Wes<strong>to</strong>n parish register distinguishes its<br />

farming folk with terms such as ‘renter’ or ‘six-hundred pound m<strong>an</strong>’. 33<br />

Not as m<strong>an</strong>y<br />

labourers left probate documents hereabouts as further north. Perhaps this zone allowed<br />

28 The pattern shown by the smaller data sample for marriage licences (Table 5.4) is less clear<br />

29 J. Yelling, ‘Lives<strong>to</strong>ck numbers <strong>an</strong>d agricultural development’, in Slater, Field <strong>an</strong>d Forest, p. 287, shows<br />

that there was less difference in numbers of lives<strong>to</strong>ck between the champion <strong>an</strong>d woodl<strong>an</strong>d areas after 1660<br />

th<strong>an</strong> in the sixteenth century. In the Worcestershire parishes of this zone he shows a slight increase in the<br />

numbers of cattle, a more dramatic increase in sheep, while horse numbers remain fairly steady <strong>an</strong>d pig<br />

numbers decline slightly. Inven<strong>to</strong>ries in my Zone B (<strong>to</strong> 1760) mention sheep, cattle, horses, pigs, geese <strong>an</strong>d<br />

poultry as well as wheat, barley, oats, peas <strong>an</strong>d clover.<br />

30 1660-79, average (me<strong>an</strong>) value for yeomen £174 <strong>an</strong>d for husb<strong>an</strong>dmen £86. 1680-99, yeomen, £104 <strong>an</strong>d<br />

husb<strong>an</strong>dmen £60.<br />

31 J. Thirsk, ed., The Agrari<strong>an</strong> His<strong>to</strong>ry of Engl<strong>an</strong>d <strong>an</strong>d Wales, 1640-1750, vol. V, (Cambridge, CUP, 1985),<br />

p. xix, discusses low grain prices in the period 1664-91.<br />

32 Yeomen’s inven<strong>to</strong>ry values r<strong>an</strong>ge from WoRO, probate of Silv<strong>an</strong>us Bushell, Bidford, yeom<strong>an</strong>, £14-1-6,<br />

<strong>to</strong> WoRO, probate of Nath<strong>an</strong>iel Edden, Wes<strong>to</strong>n, (Milcote), yeom<strong>an</strong>, £721-3-4, but the average (me<strong>an</strong>) was<br />

£253. This compares with £171 in 1700-19 <strong>an</strong>d the low of £104 in 1680-99.<br />

33 WaRO, Wes<strong>to</strong>n parish register. Yeomen’s inven<strong>to</strong>ries r<strong>an</strong>ge from Glos RO, probate of Thomas<br />

Churchley alias Chesley, Welford, yeom<strong>an</strong>, 1684, £3-18-2, <strong>to</strong> WoRO, probate of Thomas Harris,<br />

Harving<strong>to</strong>n, yeom<strong>an</strong>, 1661, £441-16-1. Husb<strong>an</strong>dmen’s probate inven<strong>to</strong>ries r<strong>an</strong>ge from WoRO, probate of<br />

James Stephens, Pitchill, Salford Priors, husb<strong>an</strong>dm<strong>an</strong>, 1695, £15-5-11 <strong>to</strong> that of John Bushell, Bidford,<br />

husb<strong>an</strong>dm<strong>an</strong>, 1676, £198-17-6. N. B. Thomas Roberts of Welford was described as both labourer <strong>an</strong>d<br />

husb<strong>an</strong>dm<strong>an</strong>, value £1-17-6.<br />

152

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!