25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 7.23 Comparison of male occupational structure (primary, secondary <strong>an</strong>d tertiary)<br />

in the 1841 census, baptisms 1813-1840, probate data 1800-1858 <strong>an</strong>d marriage licence<br />

data 1800-1837 in Zone D, The Northern (Needle) District (as % of males with known<br />

occupations) showing the bias of other sources compared with the 1841 census<br />

Adult<br />

Males<br />

1841<br />

Census<br />

Baptisms<br />

1813-<br />

1840<br />

Ratio<br />

Baptisms<br />

<strong>to</strong> Census<br />

Probate<br />

1800-<br />

1858<br />

Ratio<br />

Probate<br />

<strong>to</strong> Census<br />

Marriage<br />

licences<br />

1810-<br />

1837<br />

Ratio<br />

Marriage<br />

licences <strong>to</strong><br />

Census<br />

Primary 34.4 31.8 1: 1.08 47.9 1: 0.72 53.1 1: 0.65<br />

Secondary 53.0 62.4 1: 0.85 22.0 1: 2.41 31.2 1: 1.69<br />

Tertiary 12.5 5.9 1: 2.12 30.1 1: 0.42 15.8 1: 0.79<br />

In this zone the marriage licence data <strong>an</strong>d baptism data are closer <strong>to</strong> the census<br />

data th<strong>an</strong> probate is. As noted in other zones, baptism data understates the tertiary sec<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

Primary sec<strong>to</strong>r figures for baptisms <strong>an</strong>d the census are similar, while the other two<br />

sources exaggerate the primary share. The secondary sec<strong>to</strong>r figures differ quite widely.<br />

By the nineteenth century this zone was home <strong>to</strong> m<strong>an</strong>y employees in the needle trade,<br />

who appear in the census <strong>an</strong>d baptisms but not in marriage licences or probate. The bias<br />

of the various sources has <strong>to</strong> be kept in mind during the commentary on the different<br />

occupational groupings which follows. Where relev<strong>an</strong>t, reasons for differences between<br />

sources are explained.<br />

Table 7.24 Comparison of male occupational structure (primary, secondary <strong>an</strong>d tertiary)<br />

in Cough<strong>to</strong>n <strong>an</strong>d Studley from baptisms 1695-1769, burials 1695-1769, probate data<br />

1700-1799 <strong>an</strong>d marriage licence data 1680-1754 (as % of males with known<br />

occupations) showing bias of other sources compared with baptisms<br />

Baptisms<br />

1695-<br />

1769<br />

Burials<br />

1695-<br />

1769<br />

Ratio<br />

burial data<br />

<strong>to</strong> baptism<br />

Data<br />

Probate<br />

1700-<br />

1799<br />

Ratio<br />

probate<br />

<strong>to</strong> baptism<br />

data<br />

Marriage<br />

licences<br />

1680-<br />

1799<br />

Ratio<br />

marriage<br />

licences <strong>to</strong><br />

baptism<br />

data<br />

Primary * 30.0% 29.8% 1: 1.01 50.0% 1: 0.60 49.5% 1: 0.61<br />

Secondary * 67.6% 62.1% 1: 1.09 39.8% 1: 1.69 43.4% 1: 1.56<br />

Tertiary 3.4% 8.1% 1: 0.42 10.2% 1: 0.33 7.1% 1: 0.47<br />

* excluding labourers in all sources 46<br />

46 Probate data from each year 1700-1799; baptism <strong>an</strong>d burial data taken from Cough<strong>to</strong>n <strong>an</strong>d Studley<br />

registers 1695 <strong>to</strong> 1798 <strong>an</strong>d 1720 <strong>to</strong> 1769; marriage licence data for Cough<strong>to</strong>n <strong>an</strong>d Studley grooms from<br />

1680-1699, 1737-1754 <strong>an</strong>d 1780-1799. For baptism data including labourers see Tables 7.9 <strong>to</strong> 7.19 above.<br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!