25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

less th<strong>an</strong> 1%, but Table 7.6 (baptisms) shows <strong>an</strong> increased percentage in Period D. 88<br />

Bricks <strong>an</strong>d tiles were now made at several locations, while Tardebigge s<strong>to</strong>ne-cutters <strong>an</strong>d<br />

s<strong>to</strong>nemasons dug s<strong>an</strong>ds<strong>to</strong>ne, some of which was used in the construction of the Worcester<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Birmingham C<strong>an</strong>al. 89<br />

Road labourers are listed in the censuses along with a railway<br />

contrac<strong>to</strong>r in Beoley. 90<br />

In the building trade all the descrip<strong>to</strong>rs met with earlier are still<br />

present <strong>an</strong>d are now joined by the paper-h<strong>an</strong>ger, Charles Edward Cox, who also<br />

advertised as <strong>an</strong> account<strong>an</strong>t <strong>an</strong>d appraiser. 91<br />

Textiles, clothing <strong>an</strong>d paper<br />

Tailors <strong>an</strong>d other textile <strong>an</strong>d paper workers were always present in small numbers<br />

in this zone. 92<br />

By the 1841 census tailors comprised some 1.8% of the adult male<br />

workforce <strong>an</strong>d other textile <strong>an</strong>d paper workers 0.4%. 93<br />

As expected, the share for textile<br />

workers fell during the eighteenth century.<br />

Although few tailors left probate, other sources show that they were present in<br />

considerable numbers throughout the two centuries. For the most part tailors were not<br />

wealthy, <strong>an</strong>d one Feckenham tailor received a pauper’s funeral. 94<br />

Most of those in<br />

probate were probably masters running their own businesses, but, unusually, we also find<br />

88 Tables 7.2, 7.4 <strong>an</strong>d 7.6. In Table 7.6 those in the extractive sec<strong>to</strong>r were all brickmakers. The 1841<br />

census has a figure of 0.9% of adult males in the extractive sec<strong>to</strong>r. VCH Worcestershire vol. iv, p.15, <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Noake, Guide <strong>to</strong> Worcestershire, p. 27, mention a St<strong>an</strong><strong>to</strong>n family, ‘working colliers or nailmakers’, who<br />

disputed the lordship of the m<strong>an</strong>or of Beoley. If coal-miners, they presumably worked elsewhere. WoRO,<br />

Ipsley (Mount Pleas<strong>an</strong>t) 1841 census lists a miner (presumably visiting) in a lodging-house.<br />

89 White, The Worcester <strong>an</strong>d Birmingham C<strong>an</strong>al, p. 72. WoRO, Feckenham (Hunt End) 1851 census lists a<br />

s<strong>to</strong>ne-sawyer.<br />

90 WoRO, Feckenham <strong>an</strong>d Beoley 1841 census. (The 1851 census has m<strong>an</strong>y more road labourers in this<br />

zone th<strong>an</strong> 1841.)<br />

91 Redditch section of Robson’s Birmingham & Sheffield Direc<strong>to</strong>ry 1839.<br />

92 See Tables 7.2, 7.4, 7.11, <strong>an</strong>d 7.18.<br />

93 See Table 7.8. Baptisms 1813-1840 (Table 7.6) gives a figure of 1.3% for tailors <strong>an</strong>d 0.5% for other<br />

textile workers.<br />

94 WoRO, Feckenham burials, 1684, burial of Arthur Baggett, tailor, poor.<br />

270

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!