25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sound. 34<br />

The figures circa 1780 for Worcestershire <strong>an</strong>d Warwickshire parishes are from<br />

R<strong>an</strong>some. 35<br />

Table 3.5 suggests that population growth was very small or uneven in most<br />

parishes between 1676 <strong>an</strong>d 1780.<br />

Table 3.6 Baptism numbers in parish registers in Zone B, The Southern (Champion)<br />

Country 1575-1810<br />

Baptisms (9 year moving average) 1575 1675 1710 1735 1760 1780 1810<br />

Bidford-on-Avon 26.7 19.8 26.1 22.2 24.6 38.2<br />

Cleeve Prior 5.7 8.0 11.9 6.9 9.3 7.7<br />

Dorsing<strong>to</strong>n 2.7 3.1 3.3 2.4 4.7 3.4<br />

Harving<strong>to</strong>n 5.4 7.4 6.1 5.8 7.0<br />

Long Mars<strong>to</strong>n 6.9 6.1 8.2 7.7<br />

Pebworth *13.1 11.1 13.6 14.0 14.8 19.9<br />

Salford Priors 13.3 11.9 12.9 14.8 10.1 19.1 21.1<br />

Weethley 2.2<br />

Welford-on-Avon 8.3 13.0 11.9 *10.9 15.3 17.4<br />

Wes<strong>to</strong>n-on-Avon 0.9 2.1 4.3 3.7 2.8<br />

* See footnote for expl<strong>an</strong>ation 36<br />

For most parishes the baptism numbers shown in Table 3.6 confirm that there was<br />

uneven growth before 1780 <strong>an</strong>d more pronounced growth thereafter.<br />

34 S. Rudder, A New His<strong>to</strong>ry of Gloucestershire (1779), (reprinted Gloucester, Al<strong>an</strong> Sut<strong>to</strong>n, 1977), gives<br />

population figures rather th<strong>an</strong> houses or families hence no difference is shown between higher <strong>an</strong>d lower<br />

estimates in Table 3.5. D. Gowing, ‘The population geography of Samuel Rudder’s Gloucestershire’,<br />

Tr<strong>an</strong>s. of Bris<strong>to</strong>l <strong>an</strong>d Gloucestershire Arch. Soc., 101, (1983). Rudge, General View of the Agriculture of<br />

the County of Gloucester, pp. 354, 356, also quotes these 1779 figures. A. Percival, ‘Gloucestershire<br />

village populations’, Local Population Studies, 8, (1972), summarises sources from 1551 <strong>to</strong> 1801.<br />

Percival’s figures for 1779 agree with Rudge except that she appears <strong>to</strong> include the Warwickshire portions<br />

of the parishes of Welford <strong>an</strong>d Wes<strong>to</strong>n. In Table 3.6 I have included 10 for Bickmarsh <strong>an</strong>d 10 for Milcote<br />

accordingly.<br />

35 R<strong>an</strong>some, ‘The State of the Bishopric of Worcester’, pp. 88, 99. Unfortunately, the numbers of families<br />

in Bidford, Salford Priors <strong>an</strong>d Weethley were not supplied in the original survey.<br />

36 Pebworth’s figure for 1675 was actually based on 1674, Welford’s figure for 1760 was actually based on<br />

1758, while Wes<strong>to</strong>n’s figure for 1810 was actually based on 1809.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!