25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

parishioner’s treatment by a ‘mountyb<strong>an</strong>k’. 389<br />

In the next period this zone was served by<br />

medics in Feckenham, Beoley <strong>an</strong>d Studley. A newspaper advertisement sheds light on<br />

the modus oper<strong>an</strong>di of one Feckenham doc<strong>to</strong>r ‘that serv’d his time in London’. 390<br />

John<br />

Eades, chirurgeon of Studley was of local yeom<strong>an</strong> s<strong>to</strong>ck as was Richard Poynter, barber<br />

of Beoley. Poynter had £185 worth of debts due <strong>to</strong> him, while his working <strong>to</strong>ols were<br />

worth a mere £1-3-4. 391<br />

Female nurses or midwives rarely surface in the documentation,<br />

but one midwife was presented by churchwardens, not because of <strong>an</strong>y occupational<br />

deficiency, but as a reputed papist. 392<br />

In the 1740s Studley secured the services of<br />

Widow Serje<strong>an</strong>t as governess of their new workhouse <strong>an</strong>d William Dewes, baker, as<br />

workhouse-master. 393<br />

Studley was probably the only parish in this zone with a<br />

workhouse at this time, but the poor were a const<strong>an</strong>t problem for officials in every parish.<br />

At the start of Period C Feckenham’s barber, Samuel Pew, perhaps administered<br />

<strong>to</strong> medical needs, but medical care was becoming somewhat more specialised by the end<br />

of the period, when half the parishes had surgeons. However, overseers’ accounts reveal<br />

various women paid as (unqualified) healers or nurses. 394<br />

Some local women also acted<br />

as midwives, although Dr. Taylor of Redditch was delivering babies in the 1790s. 395<br />

Local records in the 1790s also mention two druggists. 396<br />

389 WoRO, Feckenham burials May1683 <strong>an</strong>d WoRO, BA2724, which reports surgeons without licences. E.<br />

Barnard, Some Beoley Parish Accounts 1656-1700, p. 21. A mountyb<strong>an</strong>k is a quack doc<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

390 Worcester Postm<strong>an</strong> 19 <strong>to</strong> 26 June 1719. He had perfect cures for gout, running gout <strong>an</strong>d rheumatism<br />

<strong>an</strong>d could be ‘spoke with at the White Sw<strong>an</strong>’ in Alcester every market day.<br />

391 WoRO, probate of Richard Poynter, Beoley, barber, 1710, £216-12-0.<br />

392 WoRO, BA2289/2, Beoley churchwardens’ presentments, 1706, regarding Ann Cork, midwife.<br />

393 WaRO, DR536/32, Studley workhouse accounts, 1740.<br />

394 WoRO, BA4284, Feckenham overseers of the poor accounts. Berrow’s Worcester Journal 2 July 1778<br />

reports about <strong>an</strong> unfortunate case where a ‘noted’ Feckenham ‘doctress’ gave her patient mercury in error,<br />

causing his death.<br />

395 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/webbsredditch Chapter 2 (10.30 a.m. 21 Aug. 2008).<br />

396 WoRO, probate of Richard Cox , Feckenham, 1791, mentions William H<strong>an</strong>son, druggist, <strong>an</strong>d WoRO,<br />

marrage licence of Joseph Johnson, Tardebigge, druggist, Nov. 1799. The descrip<strong>to</strong>r ‘druggist’ was<br />

apparently replacing the earlier term ‘apothecary’.<br />

328

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!