25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

continued during the late Stuart period, with Sambourne <strong>an</strong>d Studley particularly strong<br />

magnets for inward migration. 5<br />

Population estimates discussed in Chapter 3 show that this zone’s population<br />

grew far more rapidly between 1676 <strong>an</strong>d 1801 th<strong>an</strong> that of the other zones. From a<br />

starting point as the study area’s least densely populated zone, the Needle District may<br />

have grown by some 185%, almost three times the national average. Redditch itself may<br />

have grown by a phenomenal 1695%, but growth in other settlements was less dramatic. 6<br />

The needle trade was the driving force behind this demographic growth, but<br />

before 1800 a mixture of agricultural <strong>an</strong>d industrial employments by individuals <strong>an</strong>d<br />

communities insured against hard times <strong>to</strong> a certain extent. However, not everyone<br />

prospered. Overseers of the poor were greatly concerned with paupers despite the<br />

possibilities of employment offered by the needle industry <strong>an</strong>d other trades. 7<br />

The<br />

problems of the poor continued in<strong>to</strong> the nineteenth century. 8<br />

As demonstrated in Chapter 3, this zone’s population continued <strong>to</strong> grow at a rate<br />

just above the national average during Period D, continuing <strong>to</strong> increase its share of the<br />

study area’s population. 9<br />

The most industrialised parts of the zone continued <strong>to</strong> increase<br />

after 1841, whereas the populations of Cough<strong>to</strong>n <strong>an</strong>d Beoley stagnated. 10<br />

The first<br />

reliable separate population <strong>to</strong>tal for the Redditch portion of Tardebigge parish is in 1841<br />

5 See Chapter 3. From 1563 <strong>to</strong> 1670 Sambourne’s households increased from 12 <strong>to</strong> 40 <strong>an</strong>d Studley’s from<br />

50 <strong>to</strong> 121. Large, ‘Economic <strong>an</strong>d social ch<strong>an</strong>ge in North Worcestershire during the seventeenth century’,<br />

pp. 117, 139, asserts that following disafforestation of the Feckenham Forest circa 1630 the population of<br />

Tardebigge <strong>an</strong>d Feckenham had decreased. Some had perhaps moved <strong>to</strong> places like Sambourne. However,<br />

in the first half of the eighteenth century m<strong>an</strong>y ‘sojourners’ were also recorded in Tardebigge. (WoRO,<br />

Tardebigge parish register.)<br />

6 See Tables 3.11, 3.13, 3.14 <strong>an</strong>d 3.15 in Chapter 3.<br />

7 For example, WaRO, DR536/32, accounts for building Studley workhouse, 1740. WaRO, CR3434,<br />

Cough<strong>to</strong>n overseers of the poor accounts, <strong>an</strong>d WoRO, BA4284 (ix), Feckenham overseers of the poor<br />

accounts, show detailed payments <strong>to</strong> the poor at this period. See Chapter 3 for population estimates.<br />

8 For example there was a food riot in Redditch reported in Berrow’s Worcester Journal May 1800.<br />

9 See Tables 3.14, 3.15 <strong>an</strong>d 3.16 in Chapter 3.<br />

10 See Chapter 3, Tables 3.11, 3.12 <strong>an</strong>d 3.13.<br />

240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!