25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

epresented. This has <strong>to</strong> be const<strong>an</strong>tly borne in mind when discussing the data.<br />

Moreover, certain occupational groups, such as independent craftsmen, were perhaps<br />

more likely <strong>to</strong> turn <strong>to</strong> non-conformist sects, th<strong>an</strong> were yeom<strong>an</strong> farmers, who considered<br />

themselves much more as stakeholders in the traditional parish structure. For reasons of<br />

convenience rather th<strong>an</strong> deep conviction others would attend a non-conformist chapel<br />

rather th<strong>an</strong> the dist<strong>an</strong>t parish church. 34<br />

There were also m<strong>an</strong>y Rom<strong>an</strong> Catholics in the<br />

study area, particularly in those villages held by the Throckmor<strong>to</strong>n family of Cough<strong>to</strong>n<br />

Court. 35<br />

Non-conformist <strong>an</strong>d Rom<strong>an</strong> Catholic registers have also been trawled <strong>to</strong> find<br />

information. 36<br />

However, these records are not consistent enough across time <strong>an</strong>d space<br />

<strong>to</strong> be used <strong>to</strong> make me<strong>an</strong>ingful spreadsheets. M<strong>an</strong>y individuals appear in both nonconformist<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Anglic<strong>an</strong> registers, <strong>an</strong>d births <strong>an</strong>d burials of ‘papists’ are frequently<br />

recorded in Anglic<strong>an</strong> registers. 37<br />

Despite the drawbacks mentioned here the Anglic<strong>an</strong> baptism registers from 1813<br />

are the most comprehensive source for occupational information before the 1841 census.<br />

Labourers <strong>an</strong>d poorer craftsmen are well-represented in the registers (unlike probate <strong>an</strong>d<br />

marriage licence records). For the most part local baptism registers do not distinguish<br />

between agricultural <strong>an</strong>d other labourers, but in the tables of baptism data in Chapters 4<br />

<strong>to</strong> 8 I have allocated labourers according <strong>to</strong> the 1831 census. There is no suggestion that<br />

34 For example, in the needle-making colony at Astwood B<strong>an</strong>k the Baptist chapel was established in the<br />

eighteenth century, whereas the new Anglic<strong>an</strong> church was not built for <strong>an</strong>other hundred years.<br />

35 M<strong>an</strong>y local Rom<strong>an</strong> Catholics appear in WaRO, MI163, Cough<strong>to</strong>n RC register. R. Probert <strong>an</strong>d L. D’Arcy<br />

Brown discuss this register from 1758-1795: ‘Catholics <strong>an</strong>d the Cl<strong>an</strong>destine Marriages Act of 1753’, Local<br />

Population Studies, 80, (2008), pp. 78-82.<br />

36 Other registers consulted include: TNA, RG4/3280, Redditch circuit Wesley<strong>an</strong> Methodist register, TNA,<br />

RG6/230, Worcester Society of Friends register, TNA, RG8/96 <strong>an</strong>d RG4/3367, Alcester Presbyteri<strong>an</strong><br />

registers, TNA, RG4/2016, 2067, Alcester <strong>an</strong>d Astwood B<strong>an</strong>k Baptist Chapel registers, <strong>an</strong>d TNA, RG4487,<br />

Redditch Independent Congregational register.<br />

37 V. T. J. Arkell, ‘An enquiry in<strong>to</strong> the frequency of the parochial registration of Catholics in a seventeenth<br />

century Warwickshire parish’, Local Population Studies, 9, (1972), discusses the under-recording of<br />

Catholics in the Anglic<strong>an</strong> registers of Rowing<strong>to</strong>n, a parish near the study area.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!