25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>to</strong>gether the 1841 census has a figure of 6.2% of adult males for this zone compared with<br />

5.2% in baptisms 1813-1840. 64<br />

Most references <strong>to</strong> masons are in the quarrying parishes, but members of the<br />

Yates <strong>an</strong>d Smith families served the Pebworth community as masons, slaters <strong>an</strong>d<br />

plasterers over m<strong>an</strong>y generations. 65<br />

Perhaps they accessed their building-s<strong>to</strong>ne from<br />

Bidford <strong>an</strong>d Cleeve Prior. In the 1770s Rudder describes how Pebworth had houses<br />

‘chiefly of wattling <strong>an</strong>d some of brick <strong>an</strong>d fewer of s<strong>to</strong>ne, but there is not a good house in<br />

the village.’ S<strong>to</strong>ne was also scarce in neighbouring Dorsing<strong>to</strong>n, so the ‘few houses in this<br />

village are either brick or wattled.’ Perhaps the newer buildings were of brick, as a fire in<br />

the 1750s had destroyed several houses <strong>an</strong>d the church. 66<br />

The road-labourers <strong>an</strong>d road-makers listed in Bidford’s 1831 census no doubt<br />

made use of local s<strong>to</strong>ne <strong>an</strong>d its by-products, perhaps tr<strong>an</strong>sporting them outside the parish<br />

<strong>to</strong> mend roads at some dist<strong>an</strong>ce.<br />

Entrepreneurs were ever hopeful of finding mineral wealth however lacking their<br />

geological expertise at the time. Unsuccessful attempts <strong>to</strong> mine coal were made in<br />

Salford Priors, where there was also a salt-spring. 67<br />

The middle lias stratum of much of<br />

this zone contains clay, but there is no documentary evidence of clay or marl extraction<br />

here in the seventeenth century, although Salford Priors was home <strong>to</strong> a bricklayer in the<br />

64 See Tables 5.6 <strong>an</strong>d 5.8 above. In Table 5.6 (baptisms) the figures are extractive 3.7% <strong>an</strong>d building 1.5%,<br />

while those in Table 5.8 (1841 census) are extractive 0.7% <strong>an</strong>d building 5.5%. The baptism registers<br />

suggest stagnation or slight decline in the percentage of quarrymen <strong>an</strong>d brickmakers in the 1830s. Perhaps<br />

certain local quarries <strong>an</strong>d clay-pits had been over-exploited, while improved tr<strong>an</strong>sport links beg<strong>an</strong> <strong>to</strong> make<br />

it economically viable <strong>to</strong> import better raw materials in<strong>to</strong> the area from further afield. However, it may just<br />

be that more extractive workers were subsumed under the term ‘masons’.<br />

65 For example, WoRO, marriage licence of Henry Yates, Pebworth, mason, June 1721. GlosRO, marriage<br />

licence of Edward Smith, Pebworth, slatter (slater), Aug. 1797. WoRO, BA9202/6, Pebworth<br />

churchwardens’accounts, June 1760: ‘Thomas Smith, plaister his bill’.<br />

66 Rudder, A New His<strong>to</strong>ry of Gloucestershire, p. 413. The church was re-built in brick.<br />

67 VCH Warwickshire, iii, p. 158. There is no evidence that the salt-spring was ever exploited<br />

commercially as were the salt-springs at Droitwich <strong>an</strong>d S<strong>to</strong>ke Prior.<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!