25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Between 1751 <strong>an</strong>d 1801 the population of Engl<strong>an</strong>d increased by some 46.4%<br />

from 5,922,000 <strong>to</strong> 8,671,000. 10<br />

Over the same period Gloucestershire increased by some<br />

25%, Worcestershire by 29% <strong>an</strong>d Warwickshire by 75%. 11 Of course, as noted for the<br />

earlier period, population growth was not uniform within these counties. 12<br />

The likes of<br />

Birmingham <strong>an</strong>d Coventry attracted m<strong>an</strong>y outsiders, but even in the ‘rather stagn<strong>an</strong>t’<br />

country <strong>to</strong>wn of Stratford-upon-Avon 27.4% of its families were incomers in 1765. 13<br />

Martin’s study of Bidford exemplifies some of the complex fac<strong>to</strong>rs affecting population<br />

ch<strong>an</strong>ge. 14<br />

Between 1801 <strong>an</strong>d 1841 both regional <strong>an</strong>d national population growth was<br />

dramatic. Wrigley puts the population of Engl<strong>an</strong>d at some 8.67 million in 1801 <strong>an</strong>d<br />

14.94 million in 1841, (a growth of some 72 %). 15 The comparative statement from the<br />

1841 census shows county population growth between these two dates as follows:<br />

Worcestershire from 139,333 <strong>to</strong> 233,484 (68%), Gloucestershire from 250,809 <strong>to</strong><br />

431,307 (72%) <strong>an</strong>d Warwickshire from 208,190 <strong>to</strong> 402,121 (93%). 16 Population growth<br />

in the Study Area was more modest at this time, growing by 52.9%, as seen in Table 3.14<br />

below, but some parishes grew at above the national rate.<br />

An examination of each zone’s population in turn will demonstrate the striking<br />

differences between zones. For most parishes in the study area information on<br />

10 Wrigley in Floud <strong>an</strong>d Johnson, The Cambridge Economic His<strong>to</strong>ry of Modern Britain, p. 57.<br />

11 E. A. Wrigley, ‘English county populations in the later eighteenth century’, Econ. Hist. Rev., 60, (2007),<br />

p. 60. N. B. The figures differ slightly in Wrigley’s article of the same title on www.hpss.geog.cam.ac.uk<br />

(10 a.m., 12 Aug. 2008) which shows rises in Gloucestershire (approximately) 24%, Worcestershire 30%<br />

<strong>an</strong>d Warwickshire 71%.<br />

12 E. A. Wrigley, ‘Mapping the geography of English population growth 1761-1841’ on<br />

www.hpss.geog.cam.ac.uk shows that the hundreds in the study area were in the group which grew<br />

between 0% <strong>an</strong>d 50% between 1761 <strong>an</strong>d 1841.<br />

13 Martin, ‘The rise in population in eighteenth-century Warwickshire’, p. 20.<br />

14 Ibid., pp. 25, 27, 33, 36. Whereas the average age for first marriage by males went up between 1750 <strong>an</strong>d<br />

1799, the reverse was true for females. Bidford’s baptism aggregates rose after 1770 <strong>an</strong>d mortality of<br />

inf<strong>an</strong>ts <strong>an</strong>d of children up <strong>to</strong> the age of fourteen declined.<br />

15 Wrigley, in Floud, <strong>an</strong>d Johnson, The Cambridge Economic His<strong>to</strong>ry of Modern Britain, pp. 64-5.<br />

16 www.histpop.org.uk (4.45 p.m., 19 Aug. 2008).<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!