25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

are low. As well as farming, weavers tried other by-employments <strong>to</strong> make ends meet, for<br />

example, one Dorms<strong>to</strong>n weaver also r<strong>an</strong> a general s<strong>to</strong>re. 87<br />

No woolcombers are mentioned in this zone; perhaps some farmers or weavers<br />

performed this task or maybe the wool was combed in the local <strong>to</strong>wns before being put<br />

out <strong>to</strong> (female) spinners in the villages. 88<br />

However, Thomas Hulbert of Inkberrow is<br />

described as a wool-dealer in 1781. 89<br />

Spinners go largely unmentioned, but inven<strong>to</strong>ries reveal spinning wheels in m<strong>an</strong>y<br />

households, such as that of John Hunt, glover in the 1670s, who, as well as skins, leather<br />

<strong>an</strong>d gloves, also had hemp <strong>an</strong>d eight pecks of wool in his wool-chamber. The wool<br />

comprised almost half his inven<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>to</strong>tal. Hunt apparently acted as a dealer in m<strong>an</strong>y<br />

types of textile <strong>an</strong>d leather, probably putting out work <strong>to</strong> local spinners <strong>an</strong>d weavers <strong>an</strong>d<br />

also selling ‘mercery wares’. The presence of <strong>an</strong> alum-tub suggests he was also dyeing<br />

cloth, but alum could also have been used for processing leather. Hunt also had a<br />

‘raghouse’, suggesting the collection of rags for re-use, or for sale as second-h<strong>an</strong>d clothes<br />

<strong>to</strong> the poor, or <strong>to</strong> pass on <strong>to</strong> paper-mills. 90<br />

Although m<strong>an</strong>y women must have supported the textile trade by spinning, their<br />

role as weavers would be completely hidden locally if it were not for Rev. Heath’s<br />

comments that in Inkberrow in the 1790s ‘females are employed in spinning <strong>an</strong>d<br />

weaving. By the former <strong>an</strong> industrious wom<strong>an</strong> c<strong>an</strong> earn 4d. <strong>to</strong> 9d. a day; by the latter 6s.<br />

<strong>to</strong> 8s. a week. Where the m<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d his wife both weave, it frequently happens that the<br />

87 WoRO, probate of John Hom<strong>an</strong>, S<strong>to</strong>ck Green, Inkberrow, weaver, 1761, £16-8-3., <strong>an</strong>d of John Collins,<br />

Dorms<strong>to</strong>n, 1762, £17-16-4.<br />

88 Buch<strong>an</strong><strong>an</strong>, ‘Studies in the localisation of seventeenth century Worcestershire industries’, 18, p. 36,<br />

describes independent women spinners buying small amounts of wool on market day <strong>an</strong>d returning next<br />

week with yarn on which they made a h<strong>an</strong>dsome profit. Others sp<strong>an</strong> for the clothier.<br />

89 WoRO probate of Edward Hill, Inkberrow, (no occupation given), 1781, mentions Hulbert.<br />

90 WoRO, John Hunt, Inkberrow, glover, 1677, £94-10-0. Although there is no evidence of papermakers in<br />

this zone until the eighteenth century, he could have supplied paper-mills in Zone D.<br />

213

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!