25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As the eighteenth century progressed some light is shed upon the employment<br />

situation within the <strong>to</strong>wn by other sources. Jurors’ lists exist from the 1770s <strong>an</strong>d<br />

Alcester’s parish apprenticeship indentures exist in greater numbers for this period th<strong>an</strong><br />

earlier. Although findings from these are discussed in the text where relev<strong>an</strong>t, numbers<br />

were not sufficient <strong>to</strong> warr<strong>an</strong>t statistical <strong>an</strong>alysis.<br />

However, inl<strong>an</strong>d revenue<br />

apprenticeship books for Alcester exist from 1710 <strong>to</strong> 1804 <strong>an</strong>d are shown in Appendix<br />

23. 28 Some trades made little or no use of official apprenticeships, so these figures have<br />

<strong>to</strong> be treated with some caution. However, Appendix 23 does show the growth of the<br />

needle trade <strong>an</strong>d the tertiary sec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>an</strong>d the decline of the leather industry in the <strong>to</strong>wn.<br />

Table 4.9 Comparison of male occupational structure (primary, secondary <strong>an</strong>d tertiary)<br />

in the 1841 census, baptisms 1813-1840, probate data 1800-1858 <strong>an</strong>d marriage licence<br />

data 1800-1837 in Zone A, Alcester (as % of males with known occupations) showing the<br />

bias of other sources compared with the 1841 census<br />

Adult<br />

Males<br />

1841<br />

Census<br />

Baptisms<br />

1813-<br />

1840<br />

Ratio<br />

Baptisms <strong>to</strong><br />

Census<br />

Probate<br />

1800-<br />

1858<br />

Ratio<br />

Probate <strong>to</strong><br />

Census<br />

Marriage<br />

licences<br />

1810-<br />

1837<br />

Ratio<br />

Marriage<br />

licences <strong>to</strong><br />

Census<br />

Primary 13.1 17.6 1: 0.74 22.5 1: 0.58 22.5 1: 0.58<br />

Secondary 65.4 65.9 1: 0.99 46.2 1: 1.42 50.0 1: 1.31<br />

Tertiary 21.5 16.5 1: 1.30 31.3 1: 0.68 27.5 1: 0.78<br />

Table 4.9 shows the ratio of data in other sources <strong>to</strong> the 1841 census figure. The<br />

1841 census may be regarded as the most accurate source for adult male structure for that<br />

year. As may be expected, the baptism figures are closest <strong>to</strong> those in the census. While<br />

some differences between the census figures <strong>an</strong>d those in other sources c<strong>an</strong> be explained<br />

by the different time scales involved, the bias in probate <strong>an</strong>d marriage licence data is also<br />

evident. The secondary sec<strong>to</strong>r is understated in both probate <strong>an</strong>d marriage licence data,<br />

while these sources both exaggerate primary <strong>an</strong>d tertiary compared with the census data.<br />

28 TNA, IR1. These returns have been divided in<strong>to</strong> three periods <strong>to</strong> show <strong>an</strong>y ch<strong>an</strong>ge.<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!