25.12.2013 Views

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

Differing Responses to an Industrialising Economy - eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>an</strong>d periods therefore have <strong>to</strong> be treated with some caution. Nevertheless, much c<strong>an</strong> be<br />

deduced from the occupational descrip<strong>to</strong>rs used.<br />

In all <strong>an</strong>alytical tables I have omitted gentlemen, gypsies, travelling folk <strong>an</strong>d men<br />

of unspecified occupations, so that the <strong>an</strong>alysis in the tables is of those with known<br />

occupations only. In all probate <strong>an</strong>d marriage licence <strong>an</strong>alysis I have allocated all<br />

labourers <strong>to</strong> the Primary sec<strong>to</strong>r. Sources show that the majority of labourers locally did<br />

in fact work in agriculture, so for the most part this will not skew the statistics greatly,<br />

besides which labourers do not feature very strongly in these sources. In my PST tables<br />

for these sources I have usually shown Primary with <strong>an</strong>d without labourers.<br />

In <strong>an</strong>alysis of most of the parish registers which show occupations before 1813 I<br />

have treated labourers as described above, but for all baptism registers from 1813 <strong>to</strong> 1840<br />

I have separated the labourers (between Primary <strong>an</strong>d Secondary) according <strong>to</strong> the ratios<br />

shown in the 1831 census for each parish, as explained above. 64<br />

There is no suggestion<br />

that the ratio of agricultural <strong>to</strong> non-agricultural labourers was static over time, but this is<br />

probably the best way <strong>to</strong> allocate labourers in the study area before the Vic<strong>to</strong>ri<strong>an</strong><br />

censuses.<br />

Labourers are also separated between the primary <strong>an</strong>d secondary sec<strong>to</strong>rs in<br />

<strong>an</strong>alysis of the 1841 census. Apart from labourers I have not split <strong>an</strong>y trade between<br />

different sec<strong>to</strong>rs. For inst<strong>an</strong>ce all ch<strong>an</strong>dlers have been allocated <strong>to</strong> Tertiary even though<br />

they may have made their own c<strong>an</strong>dles as well as dealing in other people’s produce. The<br />

descrip<strong>to</strong>r ‘s<strong>to</strong>nemason’ in the quarrying parishes of the study area denotes a m<strong>an</strong> who<br />

quarries s<strong>to</strong>ne, deals in s<strong>to</strong>ne <strong>an</strong>d builds with s<strong>to</strong>ne. Despite his feet being in three camps<br />

64 As Cough<strong>to</strong>n <strong>an</strong>d Studley were strong in secondary occupations in the eighteenth century, for the<br />

<strong>an</strong>alysis of their eighteenth century parish registers in Chapter 7 I have also allocated labourers <strong>to</strong> the<br />

primary or secondary sec<strong>to</strong>rs according <strong>to</strong> the 1831 census.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!